 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Pilot complaint of current registration not carried in the aircraft during operations.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 310579 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199507 |
| Day | Mon |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : mkc |
| State Reference | MO |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | general aviation : corporate |
| Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
| Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | Other |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 5700 flight time type : 3000 |
| ASRS Report | 310579 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | Other |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Aircraft |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
I like to report on ongoing violation. The corporation I work for operates 2 BAE800. On jan/xq/95 the corporation agreed to a co-owner and (co-agreement) with another corporation. The company filed AC 8050-1 with the FAA but the chief pilot never put the 'pink slip' on the aircraft as required. He kept the 'pink slip' in his office where they are still today (out-box behind his desk!) the company operated the aircraft(south) several times on an international flight to canada. Part 122 air commerce regulations 122.27 (C) (2). In april one new registration (AC 8050-3) listing both companies as co-owners of the (1) aircraft arrived and was put on the respective aircraft by the chief of maintenance. The new registration for the 2ND aircraft has not been put on the respective aircraft as of today. In addition to the problems with the registration, current 'time sharing agreements' do not reflect the change in ownership. 2 previous agreements have not been amended and the 3RD most recent agreement which was signed jun/xx/95 does not show both companies as co-owners either. In addition, the last agreement is not being carried on the aircraft even when the lessee uses the aircraft under the time sharing agreement. (Mkc-DCU-mkc) we were 'forced' to fly under the current situation unless we want to loose our jobs over some 'paper work issue.' we believe that the FAA would not 'clean up' this situation because of the local influence this company has. In addition, a previous situation (2 yrs ago) about illegal generators, alternators, etc, and falsification of aircraft logbooks which was brought to the attention of the ceo, chairman of the board and his assistant, was covered up by the company. This situation resulted in firing of 1 pilot and the 'harassment' of the remaining 'whistle blowers.' we cannot get this situation resolved because we had exhausted all possibilities 2 yrs ago with the ceo turning his back on us with a more serious problem. The chief pilot is in full control with no, or very little regard for the far's, and we can only hope not to get caught.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT COMPLAINT OF CURRENT REGISTRATION NOT CARRIED IN THE ACFT DURING OPS.
Narrative: I LIKE TO RPT ON ONGOING VIOLATION. THE CORPORATION I WORK FOR OPERATES 2 BAE800. ON JAN/XQ/95 THE CORPORATION AGREED TO A CO-OWNER AND (CO-AGREEMENT) WITH ANOTHER CORPORATION. THE COMPANY FILED AC 8050-1 WITH THE FAA BUT THE CHIEF PLT NEVER PUT THE 'PINK SLIP' ON THE ACFT AS REQUIRED. HE KEPT THE 'PINK SLIP' IN HIS OFFICE WHERE THEY ARE STILL TODAY (OUT-BOX BEHIND HIS DESK!) THE COMPANY OPERATED THE ACFT(S) SEVERAL TIMES ON AN INTL FLT TO CANADA. PART 122 AIR COMMERCE REGS 122.27 (C) (2). IN APRIL ONE NEW REGISTRATION (AC 8050-3) LISTING BOTH COMPANIES AS CO-OWNERS OF THE (1) ACFT ARRIVED AND WAS PUT ON THE RESPECTIVE ACFT BY THE CHIEF OF MAINT. THE NEW REGISTRATION FOR THE 2ND ACFT HAS NOT BEEN PUT ON THE RESPECTIVE ACFT AS OF TODAY. IN ADDITION TO THE PROBS WITH THE REGISTRATION, CURRENT 'TIME SHARING AGREEMENTS' DO NOT REFLECT THE CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP. 2 PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN AMENDED AND THE 3RD MOST RECENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS SIGNED JUN/XX/95 DOES NOT SHOW BOTH COMPANIES AS CO-OWNERS EITHER. IN ADDITION, THE LAST AGREEMENT IS NOT BEING CARRIED ON THE ACFT EVEN WHEN THE LESSEE USES THE ACFT UNDER THE TIME SHARING AGREEMENT. (MKC-DCU-MKC) WE WERE 'FORCED' TO FLY UNDER THE CURRENT SIT UNLESS WE WANT TO LOOSE OUR JOBS OVER SOME 'PAPER WORK ISSUE.' WE BELIEVE THAT THE FAA WOULD NOT 'CLEAN UP' THIS SIT BECAUSE OF THE LCL INFLUENCE THIS COMPANY HAS. IN ADDITION, A PREVIOUS SIT (2 YRS AGO) ABOUT ILLEGAL GENERATORS, ALTERNATORS, ETC, AND FALSIFICATION OF ACFT LOGBOOKS WHICH WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTN OF THE CEO, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND HIS ASSISTANT, WAS COVERED UP BY THE COMPANY. THIS SIT RESULTED IN FIRING OF 1 PLT AND THE 'HARASSMENT' OF THE REMAINING 'WHISTLE BLOWERS.' WE CANNOT GET THIS SIT RESOLVED BECAUSE WE HAD EXHAUSTED ALL POSSIBILITIES 2 YRS AGO WITH THE CEO TURNING HIS BACK ON US WITH A MORE SERIOUS PROB. THE CHIEF PLT IS IN FULL CTL WITH NO, OR VERY LITTLE REGARD FOR THE FAR'S, AND WE CAN ONLY HOPE NOT TO GET CAUGHT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.