37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 315254 |
Time | |
Date | 199509 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : 1c0 |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 8500 msl bound upper : 8500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zla |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Experimental |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 45 flight time total : 433 flight time type : 179 |
ASRS Report | 315254 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : declared emergency other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Left bullhead, az, climbed to 8500 ft MSL (cruise) for about 5 mins. About 1/3 of the trailing edge of the propeller came off. Shook! I stopped the windmilling propeller and declared an emergency. I was too far from bullhead and ludlow to glide, so I headed for the interstate route 40. I was able to land on the freeway with no harm to anyone or my plane. The highway patrol were very cooperative. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: a friend of the reporter (an engineer who participated in the design of a famous experimental aircraft) inspected the propeller and told the reporter that he thought that the failure may have been a result of resonance airflow which was caused by the propeller design. The leading edge is significantly curved back, with too much material aft of the center of thrust. The blade design coupled with a fairly high rotation speed of 2850 RPM may have led to flutter. Also, contributing to fracture is a steel weight inserted through a hole in the propeller tip. Propeller sheded at the edge of the steel and the steel left the propeller before engine shut down. The efficiency of the propeller may be at the cost of safety. Reporter related the problem to the manufacturer, aymar demuth, who asserted that the propeller must have been damaged. The propeller was replaced with another manufacturer's propeller and reporter is assisting in development of a more efficient propeller suited for the lancair. The aircraft was freshly built with less than 170 flight hours total, prior to the incident. Reporter also added that he would never fly GPS routes again, unless there were numerous landing areas along the route. Note: engine is a modified io-320.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: THE PLT OF A LANCAIR MADE A FORCED LNDG AFTER THE ACFT'S PROP FRACTURED AND FAILED DURING CRUISE.
Narrative: LEFT BULLHEAD, AZ, CLBED TO 8500 FT MSL (CRUISE) FOR ABOUT 5 MINS. ABOUT 1/3 OF THE TRAILING EDGE OF THE PROP CAME OFF. SHOOK! I STOPPED THE WINDMILLING PROP AND DECLARED AN EMER. I WAS TOO FAR FROM BULLHEAD AND LUDLOW TO GLIDE, SO I HEADED FOR THE INTERSTATE ROUTE 40. I WAS ABLE TO LAND ON THE FREEWAY WITH NO HARM TO ANYONE OR MY PLANE. THE HIGHWAY PATROL WERE VERY COOPERATIVE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: A FRIEND OF THE RPTR (AN ENGINEER WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE DESIGN OF A FAMOUS EXPERIMENTAL ACFT) INSPECTED THE PROP AND TOLD THE RPTR THAT HE THOUGHT THAT THE FAILURE MAY HAVE BEEN A RESULT OF RESONANCE AIRFLOW WHICH WAS CAUSED BY THE PROP DESIGN. THE LEADING EDGE IS SIGNIFICANTLY CURVED BACK, WITH TOO MUCH MATERIAL AFT OF THE CENTER OF THRUST. THE BLADE DESIGN COUPLED WITH A FAIRLY HIGH ROTATION SPD OF 2850 RPM MAY HAVE LED TO FLUTTER. ALSO, CONTRIBUTING TO FRACTURE IS A STEEL WT INSERTED THROUGH A HOLE IN THE PROP TIP. PROP SHEDED AT THE EDGE OF THE STEEL AND THE STEEL LEFT THE PROP BEFORE ENG SHUT DOWN. THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PROP MAY BE AT THE COST OF SAFETY. RPTR RELATED THE PROB TO THE MANUFACTURER, AYMAR DEMUTH, WHO ASSERTED THAT THE PROP MUST HAVE BEEN DAMAGED. THE PROP WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S PROP AND RPTR IS ASSISTING IN DEVELOPMENT OF A MORE EFFICIENT PROP SUITED FOR THE LANCAIR. THE ACFT WAS FRESHLY BUILT WITH LESS THAN 170 FLT HRS TOTAL, PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT. RPTR ALSO ADDED THAT HE WOULD NEVER FLY GPS ROUTES AGAIN, UNLESS THERE WERE NUMEROUS LNDG AREAS ALONG THE ROUTE. NOTE: ENG IS A MODIFIED IO-320.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.