37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 326500 |
Time | |
Date | 199601 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sjo |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : slc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | other other : other pilot : atp pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 108 flight time total : 15600 flight time type : 9500 |
ASRS Report | 326500 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
In sjo, the agent for the ground handler informed me upon arrival from miami that our return flight plan (sjo-mia) had been filed via a route over gcm and northbound to mth, which took the flight over the western cuban corridor, rather than the flight plan we had already in hand which took the flight over czm to mia avoiding cuban airspace. When operated, the flight plan over cuba was approved and flown without incident, but I failed to inform the company flight follower of the change in routing prior to or during the flight. The flight follower and the company voiced displeasure over this.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF AN LGT FAILED TO NOTIFY COMPANY DISPATCHER FLT FOLLOWER OF ROUTING CHANGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPANY APPROVED OPS MANUAL.
Narrative: IN SJO, THE AGENT FOR THE GND HANDLER INFORMED ME UPON ARR FROM MIAMI THAT OUR RETURN FLT PLAN (SJO-MIA) HAD BEEN FILED VIA A RTE OVER GCM AND NBOUND TO MTH, WHICH TOOK THE FLT OVER THE WESTERN CUBAN CORRIDOR, RATHER THAN THE FLT PLAN WE HAD ALREADY IN HAND WHICH TOOK THE FLT OVER CZM TO MIA AVOIDING CUBAN AIRSPACE. WHEN OPERATED, THE FLT PLAN OVER CUBA WAS APPROVED AND FLOWN WITHOUT INCIDENT, BUT I FAILED TO INFORM THE COMPANY FLT FOLLOWER OF THE CHANGE IN ROUTING PRIOR TO OR DURING THE FLT. THE FLT FOLLOWER AND THE COMPANY VOICED DISPLEASURE OVER THIS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.