Narrative:

The name change of runway 36R to runway 36C was confusing when I reviewed the government approach plate and found 3 parallel runways. I wanted to find a center runway. When I queried the tower as to which runway I was lined up with, the controller said runway 36C. This was very confusing since I had actually lined up with the taxiway. When I saw the blue lights of the taxiway, I immediately took evasive action to correct the approach to runway 36C and made a safe landing there. My estimate of 500 ft missed contact with aircraft on the ground is based on my altimeter reading when I made the slight turn to get onto runway 36C. I never intended to land on the taxiway.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA ON APCH TO CTR RWY ALIGNS WITH TXWY INITIALLY, THEN BECOMES ORIENTED.

Narrative: THE NAME CHANGE OF RWY 36R TO RWY 36C WAS CONFUSING WHEN I REVIEWED THE GOV APCH PLATE AND FOUND 3 PARALLEL RWYS. I WANTED TO FIND A CTR RWY. WHEN I QUERIED THE TWR AS TO WHICH RWY I WAS LINED UP WITH, THE CTLR SAID RWY 36C. THIS WAS VERY CONFUSING SINCE I HAD ACTUALLY LINED UP WITH THE TXWY. WHEN I SAW THE BLUE LIGHTS OF THE TXWY, I IMMEDIATELY TOOK EVASIVE ACTION TO CORRECT THE APCH TO RWY 36C AND MADE A SAFE LNDG THERE. MY ESTIMATE OF 500 FT MISSED CONTACT WITH ACFT ON THE GND IS BASED ON MY ALTIMETER READING WHEN I MADE THE SLIGHT TURN TO GET ONTO RWY 36C. I NEVER INTENDED TO LAND ON THE TXWY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.