Narrative:

On an IFR flight plan into seattle, 25 mi out, the controller asked if I had a visual landmark in sight near the airport. I acknowledged that I had the landmark and the controller advised me to proceed direct to the landmark. This was the first IFR flight on this route during IOE after 2 days of VFR flts into this airport. The visual approach utilizes the same landmark and company procedure is to begin a descent to 2000 ft about 10 mi out. For some reason I thought I was on the visual arrival and began a descent from 3000 ft. At 2400 ft the check airman reminded me that we were on an IFR clearance, not a visual arrival. I immediately climbed back to 3000 ft. I believe this happened for several reasons. I have not flown or operated in the IFR environment during my last 3000 hours of part 135 flying. We had been doing the same route VFR, utilizing the visual arrival on all previous trips. The WX was VMC. The controller told me to proceed visually to the same landmark used for the visual arrival, causing me to mentally believe we were cleared for the visual arrival, which we were not. Contributing with the fact that I was flying just after an episode with the flu, which grounded me for 2 days, and still had a head cold at the time of this incident, which may have diminished my ability to mentally stay on top of the flight. Supplemental information from acn 334475: incident would have been avoided had pilot advised ATC he was leaving altitude.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: WHILE OPERATING ON AN IFR FLT PLAN IN VMC, A CAPT WHO WAS COMPLETING IOE INADVERTENTLY VISUALLY DSNDED WITHOUT A CLRNC FOR A LOWER ALT. THE RPTR STATES THAT HE WAS ACCUSTOMED TO OPERATING ON A VFR FLT PLAN AND FOLLOWING THE COMPANY PROCEDURAL VISUAL DSCNT AT THIS POINT.

Narrative: ON AN IFR FLT PLAN INTO SEATTLE, 25 MI OUT, THE CTLR ASKED IF I HAD A VISUAL LANDMARK IN SIGHT NEAR THE ARPT. I ACKNOWLEDGED THAT I HAD THE LANDMARK AND THE CTLR ADVISED ME TO PROCEED DIRECT TO THE LANDMARK. THIS WAS THE FIRST IFR FLT ON THIS RTE DURING IOE AFTER 2 DAYS OF VFR FLTS INTO THIS ARPT. THE VISUAL APCH UTILIZES THE SAME LANDMARK AND COMPANY PROC IS TO BEGIN A DSCNT TO 2000 FT ABOUT 10 MI OUT. FOR SOME REASON I THOUGHT I WAS ON THE VISUAL ARR AND BEGAN A DSCNT FROM 3000 FT. AT 2400 FT THE CHK AIRMAN REMINDED ME THAT WE WERE ON AN IFR CLRNC, NOT A VISUAL ARR. I IMMEDIATELY CLBED BACK TO 3000 FT. I BELIEVE THIS HAPPENED FOR SEVERAL REASONS. I HAVE NOT FLOWN OR OPERATED IN THE IFR ENVIRONMENT DURING MY LAST 3000 HRS OF PART 135 FLYING. WE HAD BEEN DOING THE SAME RTE VFR, UTILIZING THE VISUAL ARR ON ALL PREVIOUS TRIPS. THE WX WAS VMC. THE CTLR TOLD ME TO PROCEED VISUALLY TO THE SAME LANDMARK USED FOR THE VISUAL ARR, CAUSING ME TO MENTALLY BELIEVE WE WERE CLRED FOR THE VISUAL ARR, WHICH WE WERE NOT. CONTRIBUTING WITH THE FACT THAT I WAS FLYING JUST AFTER AN EPISODE WITH THE FLU, WHICH GROUNDED ME FOR 2 DAYS, AND STILL HAD A HEAD COLD AT THE TIME OF THIS INCIDENT, WHICH MAY HAVE DIMINISHED MY ABILITY TO MENTALLY STAY ON TOP OF THE FLT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 334475: INCIDENT WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED HAD PLT ADVISED ATC HE WAS LEAVING ALT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.