37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 334737 |
Time | |
Date | 199604 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sea |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 1100 agl bound upper : 1400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sea |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : unknown |
Flight Phase | landing : missed approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 217 |
ASRS Report | 334737 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 300 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
The aircraft was a fully loaded B757, routine flight from msp to sea on apr/xx/96. Some towering cumulonimbus clouds necessitated deviations during vectors for approach at sea. After jaksn intersection, we flew westerly (heading approximately 270-275 degrees) to avoid build-ups. (I was flying first officer.) we vectored west of localizer course, then intercepted GS/localizer between anvil and FAF and were cleared for runway 16R approach. We had boeing field and seatac visually during the approach. The captain and I commented on that fact, and I noted the 'usual' TCASII display of targets associated with boeing and sea airspace. The captain noted there was another B757 on final to boeing runway 13R (I never saw this aircraft due to the fact I was flying and intercepting final, etc). I estimate this aircraft was at or near the MM to runway 13R as we intercepted final. At parkk we were locked up and on GS. Shortly after parkk I disconnected and began manual flying, we were fully configured for landing, checklist complete, cleared to land. I noticed a target on TCASII (blue) turning from 9 to 10 to 10:30 O'clock, rapidly, approximately 4 1/2 mi off the left. As it seemed to be turning into us, I looked out the captain's #1 window, and observed a twin engine propeller in a steep (at least 30 degrees) angle of bank turn, coming toward us. I called out 'hey what's he doing' and both the captain and jump seater (another commuting captain) picked him up immediately. We immediately then got the TA followed shortly by the RA, climb, increase climb! When I saw him, I immediately began leveling off (deviating above GS) because I could tell he was going to be close, and I knew from many other approachs at sea, this was not normal. So we got the TA and RA above GS. I took evasive (vertical climb) action to avoid him, and the captain noted his angle of bank increasing, as he must also have been trying to 'wrap-it- up.' I believe I noted him pass below us on the TCASII at minus 300 ft. After the clear of conflict, I reestablished aircraft on GS and landed. Subsequent phone call with tower at sea revealed they believe we were at 1400 ft and the beech 1900 was at 800 ft on the radar tracks. My opinion is we were closer. The seatac tower supervisor, mr X, said the beech 1900 waved off of boeing due to loss of separation with previous landing traffic at boeing (possibly the B757 we noted as we intercepted runway 16R localizer/GS). The radar tapes need to be analyzed, and I am formally requesting you do that, please. Please send me a copy and tell me just what the vertical separation was between our aircraft. (Mr X promised us a copy of the radio xmissions but later rescinded that offer). I want to know what happened. Thankfully we were VMC and saw him early, under IMC (vintage seattle) conditions, this event would have been tragic. I think, after looking at the missed approach for boeing runway 13R that either the beech pilot executed an incorrect missed approach procedure, or he was instructed by boeing tower to execute a procedure that put him in conflict with us. Please do your best to investigate this matter. I personally do not believe that we ever were going to collide, however, for my own satisfaction, I'd like to know it won't reoccur.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR B757 RPTR EXPERIENCED A NEAR ENCOUNTER WITH A MISSED APCH BE90 NEAR SEA. CREW REACTED TO A TCASII INCIDENT AND AFTER CLBING OBSERVED TFC PASS 300 FT BELOW THEM. SEA SUPVR ADVISED THAT THE BE90 WAS A MISSED APCH AT BFI.
Narrative: THE ACFT WAS A FULLY LOADED B757, ROUTINE FLT FROM MSP TO SEA ON APR/XX/96. SOME TOWERING CUMULONIMBUS CLOUDS NECESSITATED DEVS DURING VECTORS FOR APCH AT SEA. AFTER JAKSN INTXN, WE FLEW WESTERLY (HDG APPROX 270-275 DEGS) TO AVOID BUILD-UPS. (I WAS FLYING FO.) WE VECTORED W OF LOC COURSE, THEN INTERCEPTED GS/LOC BTWN ANVIL AND FAF AND WERE CLRED FOR RWY 16R APCH. WE HAD BOEING FIELD AND SEATAC VISUALLY DURING THE APCH. THE CAPT AND I COMMENTED ON THAT FACT, AND I NOTED THE 'USUAL' TCASII DISPLAY OF TARGETS ASSOCIATED WITH BOEING AND SEA AIRSPACE. THE CAPT NOTED THERE WAS ANOTHER B757 ON FINAL TO BOEING RWY 13R (I NEVER SAW THIS ACFT DUE TO THE FACT I WAS FLYING AND INTERCEPTING FINAL, ETC). I ESTIMATE THIS ACFT WAS AT OR NEAR THE MM TO RWY 13R AS WE INTERCEPTED FINAL. AT PARKK WE WERE LOCKED UP AND ON GS. SHORTLY AFTER PARKK I DISCONNECTED AND BEGAN MANUAL FLYING, WE WERE FULLY CONFIGURED FOR LNDG, CHKLIST COMPLETE, CLRED TO LAND. I NOTICED A TARGET ON TCASII (BLUE) TURNING FROM 9 TO 10 TO 10:30 O'CLOCK, RAPIDLY, APPROX 4 1/2 MI OFF THE L. AS IT SEEMED TO BE TURNING INTO US, I LOOKED OUT THE CAPT'S #1 WINDOW, AND OBSERVED A TWIN ENG PROP IN A STEEP (AT LEAST 30 DEGS) ANGLE OF BANK TURN, COMING TOWARD US. I CALLED OUT 'HEY WHAT'S HE DOING' AND BOTH THE CAPT AND JUMP SEATER (ANOTHER COMMUTING CAPT) PICKED HIM UP IMMEDIATELY. WE IMMEDIATELY THEN GOT THE TA FOLLOWED SHORTLY BY THE RA, CLB, INCREASE CLB! WHEN I SAW HIM, I IMMEDIATELY BEGAN LEVELING OFF (DEVIATING ABOVE GS) BECAUSE I COULD TELL HE WAS GOING TO BE CLOSE, AND I KNEW FROM MANY OTHER APCHS AT SEA, THIS WAS NOT NORMAL. SO WE GOT THE TA AND RA ABOVE GS. I TOOK EVASIVE (VERT CLB) ACTION TO AVOID HIM, AND THE CAPT NOTED HIS ANGLE OF BANK INCREASING, AS HE MUST ALSO HAVE BEEN TRYING TO 'WRAP-IT- UP.' I BELIEVE I NOTED HIM PASS BELOW US ON THE TCASII AT MINUS 300 FT. AFTER THE CLR OF CONFLICT, I REESTABLISHED ACFT ON GS AND LANDED. SUBSEQUENT PHONE CALL WITH TWR AT SEA REVEALED THEY BELIEVE WE WERE AT 1400 FT AND THE BEECH 1900 WAS AT 800 FT ON THE RADAR TRACKS. MY OPINION IS WE WERE CLOSER. THE SEATAC TWR SUPVR, MR X, SAID THE BEECH 1900 WAVED OFF OF BOEING DUE TO LOSS OF SEPARATION WITH PREVIOUS LNDG TFC AT BOEING (POSSIBLY THE B757 WE NOTED AS WE INTERCEPTED RWY 16R LOC/GS). THE RADAR TAPES NEED TO BE ANALYZED, AND I AM FORMALLY REQUESTING YOU DO THAT, PLEASE. PLEASE SEND ME A COPY AND TELL ME JUST WHAT THE VERT SEPARATION WAS BTWN OUR ACFT. (MR X PROMISED US A COPY OF THE RADIO XMISSIONS BUT LATER RESCINDED THAT OFFER). I WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. THANKFULLY WE WERE VMC AND SAW HIM EARLY, UNDER IMC (VINTAGE SEATTLE) CONDITIONS, THIS EVENT WOULD HAVE BEEN TRAGIC. I THINK, AFTER LOOKING AT THE MISSED APCH FOR BOEING RWY 13R THAT EITHER THE BEECH PLT EXECUTED AN INCORRECT MISSED APCH PROC, OR HE WAS INSTRUCTED BY BOEING TWR TO EXECUTE A PROC THAT PUT HIM IN CONFLICT WITH US. PLEASE DO YOUR BEST TO INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER. I PERSONALLY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WE EVER WERE GOING TO COLLIDE, HOWEVER, FOR MY OWN SATISFACTION, I'D LIKE TO KNOW IT WON'T REOCCUR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.