37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 341917 |
Time | |
Date | 199607 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2500 msl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : lax |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B747 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | other : other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 4 |
ASRS Report | 341917 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | other other : other pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Air carrier X was heading 070 degrees from smo VOR, descending to 2500 ft, expecting ILS runway 24R. I advised air carrier X to 'change ILS to ILS runway 24L, localizer frequency is 111.7.' pilot mumbled something unintelligible. Next thing I saw was air carrier X turning sbound toward the final approach courses. I instructed the aircraft to turn right heading 360 degrees, away from aircraft on final. Standard IFR separation was not maintained. This is another example of foreign air carrier pilots doing the unexpected and compromising safety by their actions. My recommendation is to not give other than simple, standard instructions to foreign pilots. This pilot obviously did not have an understanding of the english language.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FOREIGN SPEAKING FLC FAILED TO FOLLOW APCH CTL CLRNC BY TURNING BASE LEG BEFORE BEING INSTRUCTED TO DO SO RESULTING IN ATC INTERVENTION AND INSTRUCTIONS TO TURN AWAY FROM TFC ON FINAL APCH. CTLR RPTR BELIEVED THAT THE MISTAKE BY THE FLC WAS CAUSED BY THE CREW'S UNFAMILIARITY WITH THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
Narrative: ACR X WAS HDG 070 DEGS FROM SMO VOR, DSNDING TO 2500 FT, EXPECTING ILS RWY 24R. I ADVISED ACR X TO 'CHANGE ILS TO ILS RWY 24L, LOC FREQ IS 111.7.' PLT MUMBLED SOMETHING UNINTELLIGIBLE. NEXT THING I SAW WAS ACR X TURNING SBOUND TOWARD THE FINAL APCH COURSES. I INSTRUCTED THE ACFT TO TURN R HDG 360 DEGS, AWAY FROM ACFT ON FINAL. STANDARD IFR SEPARATION WAS NOT MAINTAINED. THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF FOREIGN ACR PLTS DOING THE UNEXPECTED AND COMPROMISING SAFETY BY THEIR ACTIONS. MY RECOMMENDATION IS TO NOT GIVE OTHER THAN SIMPLE, STANDARD INSTRUCTIONS TO FOREIGN PLTS. THIS PLT OBVIOUSLY DID NOT HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.