Narrative:

Broke out from IMC. Was offered visual approach to pou. Decided to ask for practice approach. Accepted VOR/DME runway 24, since VMC, despite lack of DME, with the intent to use LORAN for distance information. Once established, started descent, became confused using LORAN and lost positional awareness, climbed back to last assigned altitude. Then having determined position, once again descended. Despite expedited descent, go around was required. Cause was lack of familiarity with avionics, particularly LORAN. Should not have accepted VOR/DME even though in VMC with safety pilot.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT OF A CESSNA 210 MADE A MISSED APCH DUE TO BEING TOO HIGH DURING A VOR DME APCH USING LORAN TYPE NAVIGATIONAL RADIO EQUIP.

Narrative: BROKE OUT FROM IMC. WAS OFFERED VISUAL APCH TO POU. DECIDED TO ASK FOR PRACTICE APCH. ACCEPTED VOR/DME RWY 24, SINCE VMC, DESPITE LACK OF DME, WITH THE INTENT TO USE LORAN FOR DISTANCE INFO. ONCE ESTABLISHED, STARTED DSCNT, BECAME CONFUSED USING LORAN AND LOST POSITIONAL AWARENESS, CLBED BACK TO LAST ASSIGNED ALT. THEN HAVING DETERMINED POS, ONCE AGAIN DSNDED. DESPITE EXPEDITED DSCNT, GAR WAS REQUIRED. CAUSE WAS LACK OF FAMILIARITY WITH AVIONICS, PARTICULARLY LORAN. SHOULD NOT HAVE ACCEPTED VOR/DME EVEN THOUGH IN VMC WITH SAFETY PLT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.