37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 354483 |
Time | |
Date | 199612 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bwi |
State Reference | MD |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 343 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bwi tower : ptk |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skylane 182/RG Turbo Skylane/RG |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : missed approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 31 flight time total : 3500 flight time type : 500 |
ASRS Report | 354483 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Aircraft was vectored to final for ILS runway 28 at bwi. Missed approach procedure given was 'turn right to 030 degrees and climb to 2000 ft for missed approach.' aircraft pilot (instrument trainee) descended to decision ht (343 ft) continued to approximate end of runway. He called missed and tower told him to execute missed approach instructions -- 030 degrees and climb to 2000 ft. Trainee did this. While executing the missed the aircraft overflew parts of airport at lower than desired altitude. How much exactly is not remembered but probably less than 500 ft above objects or close. Exact altimeter reading not remembered but in area of 1000 ft MSL. On 2 following approachs tower gave missed procedures to be '030 degrees, climb to 2000 ft, execute missed procedure 500 ft AGL.' he then advised he would call missed point due to departing traffic. ILS runway 28 at bwi middle marker not received on approach. (There is no middle marker for approach -- timed from FAF.) missed approach would be better to 'remain runway heading to 1000 ft, right turn to 030 degrees, climb to 2000 ft.' if traffic permits -- if not, what ws given on second and third approach was alright. Tower did not comment on events of first approach and missed approach but did modify next procedures (to approximately circling minimums).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C182 MISSING APCH FOLLOWED THE CLRNC GIVEN BY APCH CTLR WHICH MAY HAVE RESULTED IN AN EARLY TURN AND FLYING TOO LOW OVER PARTS OF THE ARPT.
Narrative: ACFT WAS VECTORED TO FINAL FOR ILS RWY 28 AT BWI. MISSED APCH PROC GIVEN WAS 'TURN R TO 030 DEGS AND CLB TO 2000 FT FOR MISSED APCH.' ACFT PLT (INST TRAINEE) DSNDED TO DECISION HT (343 FT) CONTINUED TO APPROXIMATE END OF RWY. HE CALLED MISSED AND TWR TOLD HIM TO EXECUTE MISSED APCH INSTRUCTIONS -- 030 DEGS AND CLB TO 2000 FT. TRAINEE DID THIS. WHILE EXECUTING THE MISSED THE ACFT OVERFLEW PARTS OF ARPT AT LOWER THAN DESIRED ALT. HOW MUCH EXACTLY IS NOT REMEMBERED BUT PROBABLY LESS THAN 500 FT ABOVE OBJECTS OR CLOSE. EXACT ALTIMETER READING NOT REMEMBERED BUT IN AREA OF 1000 FT MSL. ON 2 FOLLOWING APCHS TWR GAVE MISSED PROCS TO BE '030 DEGS, CLB TO 2000 FT, EXECUTE MISSED PROC 500 FT AGL.' HE THEN ADVISED HE WOULD CALL MISSED POINT DUE TO DEPARTING TFC. ILS RWY 28 AT BWI MIDDLE MARKER NOT RECEIVED ON APCH. (THERE IS NO MIDDLE MARKER FOR APCH -- TIMED FROM FAF.) MISSED APCH WOULD BE BETTER TO 'REMAIN RWY HDG TO 1000 FT, R TURN TO 030 DEGS, CLB TO 2000 FT.' IF TFC PERMITS -- IF NOT, WHAT WS GIVEN ON SECOND AND THIRD APCH WAS ALRIGHT. TWR DID NOT COMMENT ON EVENTS OF FIRST APCH AND MISSED APCH BUT DID MODIFY NEXT PROCS (TO APPROX CIRCLING MINIMUMS).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.