 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Widebody transport air carrier landed and turned off on taxiway 29. Flight crew missed note on chart that taxiway 29 was not an exit from runway 10. Reporter observed no lights or signage to indicate a turn off was not to be made at the taxiway.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 356690 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199612 |
| Day | Sun |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : cdg |
| State Reference | FO |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : ord |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
| Navigation In Use | Other Other |
| Flight Phase | ground other : taxi landing other |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : private pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 14300 flight time type : 1600 |
| ASRS Report | 356690 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact other |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
ATIS stated taxiway 25.1 closed. We were landing runway 10 and to get into the flow with directional txwys I planned to turn off on taxiway 25 and join taxiway 29. Our charts for cdg include 6 pages of taxi diagrams. I missed the note indicating taxiway 29 wasn't an exit from runway 10. Other 2 crew members were briefed on my intention to use taxiway 29 and neither caught the note. On landing, taxiway 29 being a lit taxiway was the one I took. There were no lights or signage indicating I shouldn't. Ground control informed us that taxiway 29 isn't to be used as they sometimes taxi aircraft out there for intersection takeoffs. There were no other aircraft taxiing and there was not a conflict. Working in our training department I plan to disseminate this information to prevent others embarrassment.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: WDB ACR LANDED AND TURNED OFF ON TXWY 29. FLC MISSED NOTE ON CHART THAT TXWY 29 WAS NOT AN EXIT FROM RWY 10. RPTR OBSERVED NO LIGHTS OR SIGNAGE TO INDICATE A TURN OFF WAS NOT TO BE MADE AT THE TXWY.
Narrative: ATIS STATED TXWY 25.1 CLOSED. WE WERE LNDG RWY 10 AND TO GET INTO THE FLOW WITH DIRECTIONAL TXWYS I PLANNED TO TURN OFF ON TXWY 25 AND JOIN TXWY 29. OUR CHARTS FOR CDG INCLUDE 6 PAGES OF TAXI DIAGRAMS. I MISSED THE NOTE INDICATING TXWY 29 WASN'T AN EXIT FROM RWY 10. OTHER 2 CREW MEMBERS WERE BRIEFED ON MY INTENTION TO USE TXWY 29 AND NEITHER CAUGHT THE NOTE. ON LNDG, TXWY 29 BEING A LIT TXWY WAS THE ONE I TOOK. THERE WERE NO LIGHTS OR SIGNAGE INDICATING I SHOULDN'T. GND CTL INFORMED US THAT TXWY 29 ISN'T TO BE USED AS THEY SOMETIMES TAXI ACFT OUT THERE FOR INTXN TKOFS. THERE WERE NO OTHER ACFT TAXIING AND THERE WAS NOT A CONFLICT. WORKING IN OUR TRAINING DEPT I PLAN TO DISSEMINATE THIS INFO TO PREVENT OTHERS EMBARRASSMENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.