B757 flight crew unable to understand rapidly delivered clearance. They attempt to contact approach controller for repeat and are unable until the third try. By this time they are about to overshoot the final approach course. Second controller comes on frequency very angry.

Home

Browse by month

Random

Latest

About

Contact

Attributes
ACN	357300
Time
Date	199701
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : dtw
State Reference	MI
Altitude	msl bound lower : 2500 msl bound upper : 2500
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Dawn
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : dtw
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Navigation In Use	Other Other
Flight Phase	descent : approach
Route In Use	enroute : on vectors
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 1000
ASRS Report	357300
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : commercial
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : far non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	controller : issued new clearance none taken : unable
Consequence	Other
Supplementary
Primary Problem	Ambiguous
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation other

Narrative:

On vectors for ILS runway 21L approach controller, in a very rapid fashion issued a turn, descent and clearance. We missed what the heading was and upon trying to ask controller to repeat instructions, were blocked on our transmission. A third attempt to ask the controller what heading to turn to was successful. However, by this time we were very close to final and the heading had us overshooting the final approach course. Another controller got on the radio and, in a very angry tone, had us fly a new heading to intercept final. In my opinion this situation could have been avoided by having controller #1 issue his clearance in a slow and deliberate manner, not seeing how fast he can say 3 different things. We saw no safety of flight issue with this situation, meaning no aircraft were around us when we overshot the localizer. I believe some controllers get used to issuing the same clearance over and over and assume the pilots know from experience what he is about to say. This controller needed to slow down his delivery.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B757 FLC UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND RAPIDLY DELIVERED CLRNC. THEY ATTEMPT TO CONTACT APCH CTLR FOR REPEAT AND ARE UNABLE UNTIL THE THIRD TRY. BY THIS TIME THEY ARE ABOUT TO OVERSHOOT THE FINAL APCH COURSE. SECOND CTLR COMES ON FREQ VERY ANGRY.

Narrative: ON VECTORS FOR ILS RWY 21L APCH CTLR, IN A VERY RAPID FASHION ISSUED A TURN, DSCNT AND CLRNC. WE MISSED WHAT THE HDG WAS AND UPON TRYING TO ASK CTLR TO REPEAT INSTRUCTIONS, WERE BLOCKED ON OUR XMISSION. A THIRD ATTEMPT TO ASK THE CTLR WHAT HDG TO TURN TO WAS SUCCESSFUL. HOWEVER, BY THIS TIME WE WERE VERY CLOSE TO FINAL AND THE HDG HAD US OVERSHOOTING THE FINAL APCH COURSE. ANOTHER CTLR GOT ON THE RADIO AND, IN A VERY ANGRY TONE, HAD US FLY A NEW HDG TO INTERCEPT FINAL. IN MY OPINION THIS SIT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED BY HAVING CTLR #1 ISSUE HIS CLRNC IN A SLOW AND DELIBERATE MANNER, NOT SEEING HOW FAST HE CAN SAY 3 DIFFERENT THINGS. WE SAW NO SAFETY OF FLT ISSUE WITH THIS SIT, MEANING NO ACFT WERE AROUND US WHEN WE OVERSHOT THE LOC. I BELIEVE SOME CTLRS GET USED TO ISSUING THE SAME CLRNC OVER AND OVER AND ASSUME THE PLTS KNOW FROM EXPERIENCE WHAT HE IS ABOUT TO SAY. THIS CTLR NEEDED TO SLOW DOWN HIS DELIVERY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.