37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 358047 |
Time | |
Date | 199701 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lgb |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : ama |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 680 |
ASRS Report | 358047 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Airport |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Situations | |
Airport | other physical facility |
Publication | Unspecified |
Narrative:
After landing runway 25L, my student and I were taxiing back for takeoff runway 25L, full length. Although we requested progressive taxi instructions, they don't like to take the time to give small aircraft true progressive instructions related to the aircraft's progress along the txwys. Ground gave us a normal taxi clearance describing the route back along the south side of runway 25L and runway 30 and cleared us to 'hold short of runway 30 at D3.' so even though the objective was to familiarize the student with the difficulties and dangers of taxiing at night in bad WX at an airport unfamiliar to him, we would just follow our taxi instructions. No problem so far. Upon approaching D3 we received a clearance to cross D3 and turn left on taxiway left. There's the problem. There is no yellow taxiway line to follow from D3 straight across to runway 30! As my student began to cross D3 he tried to follow the yellow line, assuming it would somehow take him across to taxiway left. This would have put him in position on runway 30 at D3 with traffic coming in behind. After observing my student's disorientation I took the controls and executed the instruction to cross D3 to taxiway left as I explained the situation to my student. It was dark and difficult to see across 30 to locate the center of D3 at taxiway left. A taxiway line would help a lot. We were never in any immediate danger and did not conflict with any aircraft. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the instructor pilot's intent was to have the student cross runway 30 and taxi north on taxiway left to the approach end of runway 25L, for a full length takeoff. This instructor pilot's concern is with the yellow centerline taxiway markings at this taxiway and runway intersection. They appear to be designed for aircraft departing the runway environment, instead of aircraft taxiing onto the runway. By following the yellow line, students may taxi onto the runway and turn either left or right, instead of taxiing straight across the runway. (The taxiway line splits on the runway, in either direction.) on the evening that this report was submitted, the forward vision from the cockpit was obscured by rain on the windshield, and minimal lighting. It was difficult to see the blue lights across the runway and maintain orientation due to the reduced visibility and the low ht of this aircraft. This reporter and student were utilizing an airport diagram.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A STUDENT PLT BECAME DISORIENTED AT NIGHT WHILE TAXIING AT LGB, IN LIGHT RAIN SHOWERS. THE INSTRUCTOR PLT INTERVENED. THE INSTRUCTOR PLT ALLEGES THAT THE YELLOW CTRLINE TXWY LIGHTS AT LGB TXWY D3 AND RWY 30 SPLIT L AND R IN THE RWY ENVIRONMENT, AND CAN MISLEAD A PLT TO CONTINUE FOLLOWING A YELLOW LINE RATHER THAN CROSS THE RWY TO JOIN THE OTHER TXWY.
Narrative: AFTER LNDG RWY 25L, MY STUDENT AND I WERE TAXIING BACK FOR TKOF RWY 25L, FULL LENGTH. ALTHOUGH WE REQUESTED PROGRESSIVE TAXI INSTRUCTIONS, THEY DON'T LIKE TO TAKE THE TIME TO GIVE SMALL ACFT TRUE PROGRESSIVE INSTRUCTIONS RELATED TO THE ACFT'S PROGRESS ALONG THE TXWYS. GND GAVE US A NORMAL TAXI CLRNC DESCRIBING THE RTE BACK ALONG THE S SIDE OF RWY 25L AND RWY 30 AND CLRED US TO 'HOLD SHORT OF RWY 30 AT D3.' SO EVEN THOUGH THE OBJECTIVE WAS TO FAMILIARIZE THE STUDENT WITH THE DIFFICULTIES AND DANGERS OF TAXIING AT NIGHT IN BAD WX AT AN ARPT UNFAMILIAR TO HIM, WE WOULD JUST FOLLOW OUR TAXI INSTRUCTIONS. NO PROB SO FAR. UPON APCHING D3 WE RECEIVED A CLRNC TO CROSS D3 AND TURN L ON TXWY L. THERE'S THE PROB. THERE IS NO YELLOW TXWY LINE TO FOLLOW FROM D3 STRAIGHT ACROSS TO RWY 30! AS MY STUDENT BEGAN TO CROSS D3 HE TRIED TO FOLLOW THE YELLOW LINE, ASSUMING IT WOULD SOMEHOW TAKE HIM ACROSS TO TXWY L. THIS WOULD HAVE PUT HIM IN POS ON RWY 30 AT D3 WITH TFC COMING IN BEHIND. AFTER OBSERVING MY STUDENT'S DISORIENTATION I TOOK THE CTLS AND EXECUTED THE INSTRUCTION TO CROSS D3 TO TXWY L AS I EXPLAINED THE SIT TO MY STUDENT. IT WAS DARK AND DIFFICULT TO SEE ACROSS 30 TO LOCATE THE CTR OF D3 AT TXWY L. A TXWY LINE WOULD HELP A LOT. WE WERE NEVER IN ANY IMMEDIATE DANGER AND DID NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY ACFT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE INSTRUCTOR PLT'S INTENT WAS TO HAVE THE STUDENT CROSS RWY 30 AND TAXI N ON TXWY L TO THE APCH END OF RWY 25L, FOR A FULL LENGTH TKOF. THIS INSTRUCTOR PLT'S CONCERN IS WITH THE YELLOW CTRLINE TXWY MARKINGS AT THIS TXWY AND RWY INTXN. THEY APPEAR TO BE DESIGNED FOR ACFT DEPARTING THE RWY ENVIRONMENT, INSTEAD OF ACFT TAXIING ONTO THE RWY. BY FOLLOWING THE YELLOW LINE, STUDENTS MAY TAXI ONTO THE RWY AND TURN EITHER L OR R, INSTEAD OF TAXIING STRAIGHT ACROSS THE RWY. (THE TXWY LINE SPLITS ON THE RWY, IN EITHER DIRECTION.) ON THE EVENING THAT THIS RPT WAS SUBMITTED, THE FORWARD VISION FROM THE COCKPIT WAS OBSCURED BY RAIN ON THE WINDSHIELD, AND MINIMAL LIGHTING. IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE THE BLUE LIGHTS ACROSS THE RWY AND MAINTAIN ORIENTATION DUE TO THE REDUCED VISIBILITY AND THE LOW HT OF THIS ACFT. THIS RPTR AND STUDENT WERE UTILIZING AN ARPT DIAGRAM.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.