37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 365729 |
Time | |
Date | 199704 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dfw |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Super 80 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff ground : preflight ground : holding |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 365729 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far non adherence other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
Flight dfw-den. We received hazmat form through cockpit side window via stick as door was closed at departure time. I was concerned that wheelchair was rushed on at the last min and asked the ground crew to ensure that the battery was prepared per hazmat requirements. The ground crew stated it was a dry cell and did not have to comply. I knew the batteries were either nicad, liquid, lead/acid, liquid, or gel/cel, paste or putty on the wheelchair. To my knowledge, no wheelchair batteries are dry-cell. I read the tug operator the requirements and asked him to again check to see if the battery was disconnected and secured. He sent a helper back and when he returned the tug driver said the cables were disconnected from the battery. The crew chief failed to load wheelchair data into the computer, and we took a 20 min delay at runway 17R waiting load close-out until they found him and got the close-out to reflect the hazmat form. I had suspicions about the status of the wheelchair, so ramp workers at den and myself checked the 3-WHEEL scooter at den on arrival and found 2 fluid batteries, I believe lead/acid, hooked up to 4 cables and ready to run. This is not in compliance with FAA directives or company procedure as far as I know. Problem #1: agent that checked scooter, bag identify XXX, did not properly secure battery cables and cap. Problem #2: pushback crew misinformed about hazmat loading of wheelchair and scooter batteries. They misinformed me about status of hazmat. Problem #3: late arrival of hazmat form and not loading restr article into computer at dfw caused extensive delay. The bottom line was that safety was compromised. We didn't have an incident, but not because we are standardized and following safety procedures. Delays of load close-out variety are unnecessary and costly, 20 min delay.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: S80 PIC SUSPECTED THAT A WHEELCHAIR, LOADED AT DFW AS A LAST MIN BAGGAGE TRANSFER, WAS NOT BOARDED IN ACCORD WITH THE ACR POLICY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL HANDLING. GND CREW CHKED AND REASSURED PIC THAT ALL WAS WELL. IT WAS NOT. POSTFLT CHK IN DEN REVEALED PROBS.
Narrative: FLT DFW-DEN. WE RECEIVED HAZMAT FORM THROUGH COCKPIT SIDE WINDOW VIA STICK AS DOOR WAS CLOSED AT DEP TIME. I WAS CONCERNED THAT WHEELCHAIR WAS RUSHED ON AT THE LAST MIN AND ASKED THE GND CREW TO ENSURE THAT THE BATTERY WAS PREPARED PER HAZMAT REQUIREMENTS. THE GND CREW STATED IT WAS A DRY CELL AND DID NOT HAVE TO COMPLY. I KNEW THE BATTERIES WERE EITHER NICAD, LIQUID, LEAD/ACID, LIQUID, OR GEL/CEL, PASTE OR PUTTY ON THE WHEELCHAIR. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NO WHEELCHAIR BATTERIES ARE DRY-CELL. I READ THE TUG OPERATOR THE REQUIREMENTS AND ASKED HIM TO AGAIN CHK TO SEE IF THE BATTERY WAS DISCONNECTED AND SECURED. HE SENT A HELPER BACK AND WHEN HE RETURNED THE TUG DRIVER SAID THE CABLES WERE DISCONNECTED FROM THE BATTERY. THE CREW CHIEF FAILED TO LOAD WHEELCHAIR DATA INTO THE COMPUTER, AND WE TOOK A 20 MIN DELAY AT RWY 17R WAITING LOAD CLOSE-OUT UNTIL THEY FOUND HIM AND GOT THE CLOSE-OUT TO REFLECT THE HAZMAT FORM. I HAD SUSPICIONS ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE WHEELCHAIR, SO RAMP WORKERS AT DEN AND MYSELF CHKED THE 3-WHEEL SCOOTER AT DEN ON ARR AND FOUND 2 FLUID BATTERIES, I BELIEVE LEAD/ACID, HOOKED UP TO 4 CABLES AND READY TO RUN. THIS IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FAA DIRECTIVES OR COMPANY PROC AS FAR AS I KNOW. PROB #1: AGENT THAT CHKED SCOOTER, BAG IDENT XXX, DID NOT PROPERLY SECURE BATTERY CABLES AND CAP. PROB #2: PUSHBACK CREW MISINFORMED ABOUT HAZMAT LOADING OF WHEELCHAIR AND SCOOTER BATTERIES. THEY MISINFORMED ME ABOUT STATUS OF HAZMAT. PROB #3: LATE ARR OF HAZMAT FORM AND NOT LOADING RESTR ARTICLE INTO COMPUTER AT DFW CAUSED EXTENSIVE DELAY. THE BOTTOM LINE WAS THAT SAFETY WAS COMPROMISED. WE DIDN'T HAVE AN INCIDENT, BUT NOT BECAUSE WE ARE STANDARDIZED AND FOLLOWING SAFETY PROCS. DELAYS OF LOAD CLOSE-OUT VARIETY ARE UNNECESSARY AND COSTLY, 20 MIN DELAY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.