Narrative:

Because of the amount of VFR traffic near bdr indicating at and below 3500 ft, it was coordinated to leave air carrier X on vyy at 5000 ft (landing jfk). Air carrier Y (BE02 inbound lga on V475 at 6000 ft) was swbound at 6000 ft on V475. Just as I issued traffic to air carrier X, he informed me that he was climbing due to an RA. When I told him that I did not observe any traffic in the area above 3500 ft, he told me his TCASII showed a target 300 ft below him which caused the RA climb. He immediately got an RA for a descent because of air carrier Y. At least one other controller told me that he did not observe any traffic in the area of bdr that would have caused air carrier X to have an RA climb.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: APCH CTLR GAVE TA TO ACR X AT 5000 FT ON ACR Y XING OVERHEAD BDR AT 6000 FT. ACR X RECEIVED A TCASII RA ON TFC BELOW HIM AND CLBED CAUSING LTSS WITH ACR Y WHICH CAUSED ACR X TO GET A DSND RA. THE CTLR HAD NO OTHER TFC BELOW OR NEAR ACR X AND SAW NO REASON FOR THE CLB RA TO BEGIN WITH.

Narrative: BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF VFR TFC NEAR BDR INDICATING AT AND BELOW 3500 FT, IT WAS COORDINATED TO LEAVE ACR X ON VYY AT 5000 FT (LNDG JFK). ACR Y (BE02 INBOUND LGA ON V475 AT 6000 FT) WAS SWBOUND AT 6000 FT ON V475. JUST AS I ISSUED TFC TO ACR X, HE INFORMED ME THAT HE WAS CLBING DUE TO AN RA. WHEN I TOLD HIM THAT I DID NOT OBSERVE ANY TFC IN THE AREA ABOVE 3500 FT, HE TOLD ME HIS TCASII SHOWED A TARGET 300 FT BELOW HIM WHICH CAUSED THE RA CLB. HE IMMEDIATELY GOT AN RA FOR A DSCNT BECAUSE OF ACR Y. AT LEAST ONE OTHER CTLR TOLD ME THAT HE DID NOT OBSERVE ANY TFC IN THE AREA OF BDR THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED ACR X TO HAVE AN RA CLB.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.