37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 370152 |
Time | |
Date | 199705 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : vxv |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7000 msl bound upper : 7280 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : ztl |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Cardinal 177/177RG |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 70 flight time total : 1250 flight time type : 950 |
ASRS Report | 370152 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather other anomaly other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course flight crew : regained aircraft control flight crew : exited adverse environment |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
At about XA00 on may/xx/97, I was on an IFR flight plan from srb, tn, to N99, PA. Before reaching the final cruise altitude of 9000 ft, the controller (I believe it was tys approach) held me at 7000 ft due to crossing baron traffic at 8000 ft. I stopped the climb and held 7000 ft as instructed. While cruising in IMC at 7000 ft, I suddenly encountered an area of heavy rain and simultaneously very strong updrafts. Within a second or two, I reacted by pushing the nose down but with the very strong updrafts the airplane continued to climb as the airspeed increased while I continued to push the nose down. Within 5-7 seconds after entering the heavy rain the aircraft had gained between 250-280 ft and increased speed by 15-20 KTS. Around this time, I asked the controller for a block altitude to 8000 ft. Of course, the controller advised me that she could not provide the clearance. Within 10-15 seconds after entering the area of heavy rain, I was able to descend back to 7000 ft. During this time, power was reduced and the aircraft was trimmed nose down. Things that could have been done differently include: 1) rather than ask for the impossible clearance I should have responded to the controller by explaining that I was having trouble maintaining altitude and that I was trying to correct the situation. 2) while the airspeed at the time was too high to allow lowering the gear, a lower power setting when entering areas of suspect turbulence would provide a margin of safety and would allow lowering of the gear.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C177 MAINTAINING 7000 FT ENCOUNTERED STRONG UPDRAFT IN IMC CONDITIONS. DEVIATED FROM ALT 280 FT. REQUESTED BLOCK ALT BUT CTR UNABLE ACCOUNT TFC AT 8000 FT. REGAINED ASSIGNED ALT 7000 FT.
Narrative: AT ABOUT XA00 ON MAY/XX/97, I WAS ON AN IFR FLT PLAN FROM SRB, TN, TO N99, PA. BEFORE REACHING THE FINAL CRUISE ALT OF 9000 FT, THE CTLR (I BELIEVE IT WAS TYS APCH) HELD ME AT 7000 FT DUE TO XING BARON TFC AT 8000 FT. I STOPPED THE CLB AND HELD 7000 FT AS INSTRUCTED. WHILE CRUISING IN IMC AT 7000 FT, I SUDDENLY ENCOUNTERED AN AREA OF HVY RAIN AND SIMULTANEOUSLY VERY STRONG UPDRAFTS. WITHIN A SECOND OR TWO, I REACTED BY PUSHING THE NOSE DOWN BUT WITH THE VERY STRONG UPDRAFTS THE AIRPLANE CONTINUED TO CLB AS THE AIRSPD INCREASED WHILE I CONTINUED TO PUSH THE NOSE DOWN. WITHIN 5-7 SECONDS AFTER ENTERING THE HVY RAIN THE ACFT HAD GAINED BTWN 250-280 FT AND INCREASED SPD BY 15-20 KTS. AROUND THIS TIME, I ASKED THE CTLR FOR A BLOCK ALT TO 8000 FT. OF COURSE, THE CTLR ADVISED ME THAT SHE COULD NOT PROVIDE THE CLRNC. WITHIN 10-15 SECONDS AFTER ENTERING THE AREA OF HVY RAIN, I WAS ABLE TO DSND BACK TO 7000 FT. DURING THIS TIME, PWR WAS REDUCED AND THE ACFT WAS TRIMMED NOSE DOWN. THINGS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE DIFFERENTLY INCLUDE: 1) RATHER THAN ASK FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE CLRNC I SHOULD HAVE RESPONDED TO THE CTLR BY EXPLAINING THAT I WAS HAVING TROUBLE MAINTAINING ALT AND THAT I WAS TRYING TO CORRECT THE SIT. 2) WHILE THE AIRSPD AT THE TIME WAS TOO HIGH TO ALLOW LOWERING THE GEAR, A LOWER PWR SETTING WHEN ENTERING AREAS OF SUSPECT TURB WOULD PROVIDE A MARGIN OF SAFETY AND WOULD ALLOW LOWERING OF THE GEAR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.