Narrative:

ATC assigned an altimeter (29.02). We thought we heard 29.92. We read back 29.92 and received an acknowledgment. Later, ATC asked us to report our altitude, we responded and corrected. ATC seemed apologetic and stated that there 'was no problem.' I (the captain) was providing IOE to a brand new first officer. Pressure was dropping erratically during our flight from ewr direct bos. We had '6' altimeter changes within a 30 min period. There was clearly a marked miscom on someone's part. There was no conflict during any phase of flight.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF AN MLG SET THE WRONG ALTIMETER SETTING CAUSING AN ALT OVERSHOOT DUE TO ERROR IN READBACK BY FLC AND HEARBACK BY ATC.

Narrative: ATC ASSIGNED AN ALTIMETER (29.02). WE THOUGHT WE HEARD 29.92. WE READ BACK 29.92 AND RECEIVED AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT. LATER, ATC ASKED US TO RPT OUR ALT, WE RESPONDED AND CORRECTED. ATC SEEMED APOLOGETIC AND STATED THAT THERE 'WAS NO PROB.' I (THE CAPT) WAS PROVIDING IOE TO A BRAND NEW FO. PRESSURE WAS DROPPING ERRATICALLY DURING OUR FLT FROM EWR DIRECT BOS. WE HAD '6' ALTIMETER CHANGES WITHIN A 30 MIN PERIOD. THERE WAS CLEARLY A MARKED MISCOM ON SOMEONE'S PART. THERE WAS NO CONFLICT DURING ANY PHASE OF FLT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.