37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 392950 |
Time | |
Date | 199802 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : dfw |
State Reference | TX |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zfw tower : iad |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Super 80 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | arrival other arrival star : star enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
ASRS Report | 392950 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
ATC cleared us to fly a heading to intercept the dfw 134 degree radial to resume the arrival to dfw. I read back, 'intercept the dfw 134 degree radial to resume...' then, later, the next controller asked why we were north of the inbound radial. I explained that we realized the arrival radial is the 124 degree, but that the previous controller issued, and I read back, the 134 degree radial. Nothing more was said by the controller. No conflicts occurred.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN S80 FLT IS FOUND TO BE INBOUND ON THE 134 DEG RADIAL FOR A STAR ARR PROC INTO DFW. RADAR CTLR #2 ASKS WHY THE 134 DEG RADIAL VERSUS THE PUBLISHED 124 DEG RADIAL?
Narrative: ATC CLRED US TO FLY A HEADING TO INTERCEPT THE DFW 134 DEG RADIAL TO RESUME THE ARR TO DFW. I READ BACK, 'INTERCEPT THE DFW 134 DEG RADIAL TO RESUME...' THEN, LATER, THE NEXT CTLR ASKED WHY WE WERE N OF THE INBOUND RADIAL. I EXPLAINED THAT WE REALIZED THE ARR RADIAL IS THE 124 DEG, BUT THAT THE PREVIOUS CTLR ISSUED, AND I READ BACK, THE 134 DEG RADIAL. NOTHING MORE WAS SAID BY THE CTLR. NO CONFLICTS OCCURRED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.