Narrative:

Climb out on wagge 1 departure, GPWS alerted us to 'pull up.' applied maximum power and climbed until GPWS shut off. We were exactly aligned on SID as published. We could see we were clear of terrain when GPWS went off. We performed standard procedures for GPWS alert. #1 engine exceeded maximum book limit for 10 seconds. We contacted dispatch and maintenance to discuss the situation. Maintenance confirmed that we had in fact not exceeded the limitation on that engine because of its higher rating (-17R instead of -17). We already knew this as a crew but this reconfirmed this fact through maintenance. Dispatch agreed that the flight should be continued without any emergency actions taken. We used standard procedures to handle the above situation. We reviewed all modes of activation for the GPWS and at no time should we have set it off. Maintenance was also notified of the false warning and our reaction to it. I believe the faulty GPWS warning caused us to perform procedures that were not necessary. If the aircraft was flown in standard takeoff confign 1000 ft higher than present SID requirement (6412 ft) clean up altitude, we would not have gotten a false warning.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B727 CREW RECEIVED A FALSE GPWS WARNING 'PULL UP' WHEN DEPARTING RNO, NV.

Narrative: CLBOUT ON WAGGE 1 DEP, GPWS ALERTED US TO 'PULL UP.' APPLIED MAX PWR AND CLBED UNTIL GPWS SHUT OFF. WE WERE EXACTLY ALIGNED ON SID AS PUBLISHED. WE COULD SEE WE WERE CLR OF TERRAIN WHEN GPWS WENT OFF. WE PERFORMED STANDARD PROCS FOR GPWS ALERT. #1 ENG EXCEEDED MAX BOOK LIMIT FOR 10 SECONDS. WE CONTACTED DISPATCH AND MAINT TO DISCUSS THE SIT. MAINT CONFIRMED THAT WE HAD IN FACT NOT EXCEEDED THE LIMITATION ON THAT ENG BECAUSE OF ITS HIGHER RATING (-17R INSTEAD OF -17). WE ALREADY KNEW THIS AS A CREW BUT THIS RECONFIRMED THIS FACT THROUGH MAINT. DISPATCH AGREED THAT THE FLT SHOULD BE CONTINUED WITHOUT ANY EMER ACTIONS TAKEN. WE USED STANDARD PROCS TO HANDLE THE ABOVE SIT. WE REVIEWED ALL MODES OF ACTIVATION FOR THE GPWS AND AT NO TIME SHOULD WE HAVE SET IT OFF. MAINT WAS ALSO NOTIFIED OF THE FALSE WARNING AND OUR REACTION TO IT. I BELIEVE THE FAULTY GPWS WARNING CAUSED US TO PERFORM PROCS THAT WERE NOT NECESSARY. IF THE ACFT WAS FLOWN IN STANDARD TKOF CONFIGN 1000 FT HIGHER THAN PRESENT SID REQUIREMENT (6412 FT) CLEAN UP ALT, WE WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN A FALSE WARNING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.