37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 421460 |
Time | |
Date | 199811 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : chs |
State Reference | SC |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 500 agl bound upper : 1546 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival other enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 421460 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : unspecified |
Narrative:
This field presents a continuing problem of late dscnts offered by ATC from north arriving aircraft landing to the south. (Typically clt-chs via cae.) captain, flying, did not accelerate descent to compensate. With airport in sight, approach cleared us for visual to runway 15. Somewhat high descent rate required. Turning final, inside the marker, a fog or cloud layer, previously unseen, partially obscured the touchdown zone, though most of runway was in sight. Approach, evidently also working tower, preemptively cleared us for ILS approach. The descent rate, for ILS approach, was then a bit high for company standards. We stabilized at about 500 ft. Ok for visual, but not for ILS. However, we did not have reason to expect obscuration. I think this was a well- handled situation on the part of the controller who, having lost sight of us, realized that we must be losing the field as well. (He asked, 'is there a layer out there or something?') also, I thought the captain flew nicely on the localizer and never below GS, although the rate was high. Just wondering whether we should have gone around. It happened very quickly, though the late descent from ZJX is normal at chs.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 CREW WAS GIVEN A LATE DSCNT CLRNC.
Narrative: THIS FIELD PRESENTS A CONTINUING PROB OF LATE DSCNTS OFFERED BY ATC FROM N ARRIVING ACFT LNDG TO THE S. (TYPICALLY CLT-CHS VIA CAE.) CAPT, FLYING, DID NOT ACCELERATE DSCNT TO COMPENSATE. WITH ARPT IN SIGHT, APCH CLRED US FOR VISUAL TO RWY 15. SOMEWHAT HIGH DSCNT RATE REQUIRED. TURNING FINAL, INSIDE THE MARKER, A FOG OR CLOUD LAYER, PREVIOUSLY UNSEEN, PARTIALLY OBSCURED THE TOUCHDOWN ZONE, THOUGH MOST OF RWY WAS IN SIGHT. APCH, EVIDENTLY ALSO WORKING TWR, PREEMPTIVELY CLRED US FOR ILS APCH. THE DSCNT RATE, FOR ILS APCH, WAS THEN A BIT HIGH FOR COMPANY STANDARDS. WE STABILIZED AT ABOUT 500 FT. OK FOR VISUAL, BUT NOT FOR ILS. HOWEVER, WE DID NOT HAVE REASON TO EXPECT OBSCURATION. I THINK THIS WAS A WELL- HANDLED SIT ON THE PART OF THE CTLR WHO, HAVING LOST SIGHT OF US, REALIZED THAT WE MUST BE LOSING THE FIELD AS WELL. (HE ASKED, 'IS THERE A LAYER OUT THERE OR SOMETHING?') ALSO, I THOUGHT THE CAPT FLEW NICELY ON THE LOC AND NEVER BELOW GS, ALTHOUGH THE RATE WAS HIGH. JUST WONDERING WHETHER WE SHOULD HAVE GONE AROUND. IT HAPPENED VERY QUICKLY, THOUGH THE LATE DSCNT FROM ZJX IS NORMAL AT CHS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.