37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 428350 |
Time | |
Date | 199902 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : mgj.ils |
Altitude | msl single value : 1610 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Cougar AA7 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 3 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 650 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 428350 |
Person 2 | |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I was performing ILS approachs to mgj runway 3 to evaluate a newly installed HSI. After calling out the aircraft's position over mgj, 4 mi out from mgj, the pilot of a plane departing runway 26 stated on frequency that practice approachs were not to be made to runway 3 as runway 26 was the active runway. I stated my intention to continue the approach and to break off the approach prior to reaching the field. The pilot of the departing aircraft became agitated and again stated that approachs to runway 3 should not be made. New york approach advised me that the pilot of the departing aircraft had complained of a 'near miss.' no such thing had taken place. Both myself and an onboard CFI had visual contact with the departing aircraft from its takeoff roll. Visual separation was maintained at all times.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GA7 PLT PRACTICING ILS APCH AT UNCTLED ARPT ENCOUNTERS OPPOSITE DIRECTION DEP TFC.
Narrative: I WAS PERFORMING ILS APCHS TO MGJ RWY 3 TO EVALUATE A NEWLY INSTALLED HSI. AFTER CALLING OUT THE ACFT'S POS OVER MGJ, 4 MI OUT FROM MGJ, THE PLT OF A PLANE DEPARTING RWY 26 STATED ON FREQ THAT PRACTICE APCHS WERE NOT TO BE MADE TO RWY 3 AS RWY 26 WAS THE ACTIVE RWY. I STATED MY INTENTION TO CONTINUE THE APCH AND TO BREAK OFF THE APCH PRIOR TO REACHING THE FIELD. THE PLT OF THE DEPARTING ACFT BECAME AGITATED AND AGAIN STATED THAT APCHS TO RWY 3 SHOULD NOT BE MADE. NEW YORK APCH ADVISED ME THAT THE PLT OF THE DEPARTING ACFT HAD COMPLAINED OF A 'NEAR MISS.' NO SUCH THING HAD TAKEN PLACE. BOTH MYSELF AND AN ONBOARD CFI HAD VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE DEPARTING ACFT FROM ITS TKOF ROLL. VISUAL SEPARATION WAS MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.