 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A CFI and his student pilot suffer through one critical ground conflict and one non critical due to non tower traffic pattern deviations at 42J, fl.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 431855 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199903 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : 42j.airport |
| State Reference | FL |
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Weather Elements | other |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : msn |
| Operator | general aviation : instructional |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | landing : roll |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Cessna 150 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Navigation In Use | other |
| Flight Phase | landing : go around |
| Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | instruction : instructor |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 3000 flight time type : 500 |
| ASRS Report | 431855 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | instruction : trainee |
| Qualification | pilot : student |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : ground critical conflict : ground less severe inflight encounter other non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : executed go around other |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 250 vertical : 300 |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Environmental Factor Airport |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Entered pattern with normal 45 degree right turn 1000 ft for runway 4. Smoke from fire north of field indicated runway 4 best. No other traffic heard on unicom or seen by me or my student. No traffic observed in ground taxi or in pattern flying to indicate runway in use, so proceeded to land. After touchdown and during rollout midway down the runway, a C150 appeared landing on runway 22. He added power, moved over to my left and executed a missed approach. The cessna then landed and I talked to the pilot who came into the FBO. I told him the smoke from the fire probably reduced the visibility of both planes, as we were white/red (so was he) in color. No voice xmissions were heard even though I had the radio on and was instructing the student how to look for other traffic and 'see and be seen.' several other aircraft landed after me, using runway 4. On my departure I elected runway 22 and a T34C was executing a landing on runway 4. He switched to runway 22 after he saw me on the end of runway 22. The wind was light and variable. Windsock was limp so was of no use. Smoke from fires north of field were best indicators of wind.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CFI AND HIS STUDENT PLT SUFFER THROUGH ONE CRITICAL GND CONFLICT AND ONE NON CRITICAL DUE TO NON TWR TFC PATTERN DEVS AT 42J, FL.
Narrative: ENTERED PATTERN WITH NORMAL 45 DEG R TURN 1000 FT FOR RWY 4. SMOKE FROM FIRE N OF FIELD INDICATED RWY 4 BEST. NO OTHER TFC HEARD ON UNICOM OR SEEN BY ME OR MY STUDENT. NO TFC OBSERVED IN GND TAXI OR IN PATTERN FLYING TO INDICATE RWY IN USE, SO PROCEEDED TO LAND. AFTER TOUCHDOWN AND DURING ROLLOUT MIDWAY DOWN THE RWY, A C150 APPEARED LNDG ON RWY 22. HE ADDED PWR, MOVED OVER TO MY L AND EXECUTED A MISSED APCH. THE CESSNA THEN LANDED AND I TALKED TO THE PLT WHO CAME INTO THE FBO. I TOLD HIM THE SMOKE FROM THE FIRE PROBABLY REDUCED THE VISIBILITY OF BOTH PLANES, AS WE WERE WHITE/RED (SO WAS HE) IN COLOR. NO VOICE XMISSIONS WERE HEARD EVEN THOUGH I HAD THE RADIO ON AND WAS INSTRUCTING THE STUDENT HOW TO LOOK FOR OTHER TFC AND 'SEE AND BE SEEN.' SEVERAL OTHER ACFT LANDED AFTER ME, USING RWY 4. ON MY DEP I ELECTED RWY 22 AND A T34C WAS EXECUTING A LNDG ON RWY 4. HE SWITCHED TO RWY 22 AFTER HE SAW ME ON THE END OF RWY 22. THE WIND WAS LIGHT AND VARIABLE. WINDSOCK WAS LIMP SO WAS OF NO USE. SMOKE FROM FIRES N OF FIELD WERE BEST INDICATORS OF WIND.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.