Narrative:

While this is a very minor problem, my failure to adequately supervise the flight engineer in writing up the aft lavatory and proper signoff procedures led to our takeoff with the logbook and the release not in agreement as to airworthiness. All maintenance operations restrs in the MEL were complied with by qualified people. The release showed the MEL item with initials. The flight engineer thought he had talked to maintenance control, when in fact he talked to a dispatcher. What he took to be a maintenance control authority/authorized number did not look correct to me, but I decided to take off where we could get a better (clrer) radio link with maintenance control and then enter the proper number. When we made that call it became clear that maintenance control had not been consulted, as required by our manuals.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B727 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN LOGBOOK ITEMS UNANSWERED.

Narrative: WHILE THIS IS A VERY MINOR PROB, MY FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE FE IN WRITING UP THE AFT LAVATORY AND PROPER SIGNOFF PROCS LED TO OUR TKOF WITH THE LOGBOOK AND THE RELEASE NOT IN AGREEMENT AS TO AIRWORTHINESS. ALL MAINT OPS RESTRS IN THE MEL WERE COMPLIED WITH BY QUALIFIED PEOPLE. THE RELEASE SHOWED THE MEL ITEM WITH INITIALS. THE FE THOUGHT HE HAD TALKED TO MAINT CTL, WHEN IN FACT HE TALKED TO A DISPATCHER. WHAT HE TOOK TO BE A MAINT CTL AUTH NUMBER DID NOT LOOK CORRECT TO ME, BUT I DECIDED TO TAKE OFF WHERE WE COULD GET A BETTER (CLRER) RADIO LINK WITH MAINT CTL AND THEN ENTER THE PROPER NUMBER. WHEN WE MADE THAT CALL IT BECAME CLR THAT MAINT CTL HAD NOT BEEN CONSULTED, AS REQUIRED BY OUR MANUALS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.