37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 434540 |
Time | |
Date | 199904 |
Day | 199904 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sequ.airport |
State Reference | FO |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Fog |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 19500 flight time type : 350 |
ASRS Report | 434540 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Company |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
After arrival in south america of our scheduled air carrier flight and during the postflt debriefing, it was discovered that the ZZZ VOR, south of the airport, was OTS. Even though our arrival procedure that evening used the YYY VOR, north of the airport, to navigation to the runway 35 ILS, an engine out missed approach (a rare possibility indeed) would have required the use of ZZZ VOR, although as an FMS/EFIS aircraft we had a real time picture of our navigation situation, our procedures into quito were based on raw data navigation due to conservative terrain considerations. Technically, we were in violation of our own operations specifications. We rechked our company flight release and found no mention of the outage, however, the navigation data NOTAM section of our commercial chart manuals did confirm the outage. The moral is: it pays to check all available information regarding a flight, and the valuable source in the commercial charts section had been overlooked.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B757 FLEW TO A FOREIGN CITY ARPT THAT REQUIRED A SINGLE ENG APCH THAT UTILIZED AN OTS VOR.
Narrative: AFTER ARR IN SOUTH AMERICA OF OUR SCHEDULED ACR FLT AND DURING THE POSTFLT DEBRIEFING, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE ZZZ VOR, S OF THE ARPT, WAS OTS. EVEN THOUGH OUR ARR PROC THAT EVENING USED THE YYY VOR, N OF THE ARPT, TO NAV TO THE RWY 35 ILS, AN ENG OUT MISSED APCH (A RARE POSSIBILITY INDEED) WOULD HAVE REQUIRED THE USE OF ZZZ VOR, ALTHOUGH AS AN FMS/EFIS ACFT WE HAD A REAL TIME PICTURE OF OUR NAV SIT, OUR PROCS INTO QUITO WERE BASED ON RAW DATA NAV DUE TO CONSERVATIVE TERRAIN CONSIDERATIONS. TECHNICALLY, WE WERE IN VIOLATION OF OUR OWN OPS SPECS. WE RECHKED OUR COMPANY FLT RELEASE AND FOUND NO MENTION OF THE OUTAGE, HOWEVER, THE NAV DATA NOTAM SECTION OF OUR COMMERCIAL CHART MANUALS DID CONFIRM THE OUTAGE. THE MORAL IS: IT PAYS TO CHK ALL AVAILABLE INFO REGARDING A FLT, AND THE VALUABLE SOURCE IN THE COMMERCIAL CHARTS SECTION HAD BEEN OVERLOOKED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.