Narrative:

On an instrument departure from paom-paot ome-ome J123 otz-otz (course from ome 007 degrees) via the departure procedure for runway 27, made a right turn after departure direct to ome then turned left on the airway northbound. The departure procedure as written is confusing. I wonder if it could be rewritten. I believe we should have turned left then turned direct nome above 2200 ft. This is especially confusing due to the direction of the destination not the initial NAVAID and altitude crossing it.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF A B737-400 FAILED TO FOLLOW THE STANDARD DEP PROC AFTER TKOF AT A NON CTLED ARPT BY NOT TURNING TO INTERCEPT A VOR RADIAL AS PUBLISHED.

Narrative: ON AN INST DEP FROM PAOM-PAOT OME-OME J123 OTZ-OTZ (COURSE FROM OME 007 DEGS) VIA THE DEP PROC FOR RWY 27, MADE A R TURN AFTER DEP DIRECT TO OME THEN TURNED L ON THE AIRWAY NBOUND. THE DEP PROC AS WRITTEN IS CONFUSING. I WONDER IF IT COULD BE REWRITTEN. I BELIEVE WE SHOULD HAVE TURNED L THEN TURNED DIRECT NOME ABOVE 2200 FT. THIS IS ESPECIALLY CONFUSING DUE TO THE DIRECTION OF THE DEST NOT THE INITIAL NAVAID AND ALT XING IT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.