37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 445679 |
Time | |
Date | 199908 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : hpn.airport |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | msl single value : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : hpn.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : vfr |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : hpn.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : vfr |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : instructor oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 300 flight time total : 850 flight time type : 800 |
ASRS Report | 445679 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 100 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Airport ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
I was with a student doing touch and goes in closed traffic. On the downwind for our third touch and go, tower asked us to fall in behind the cessna off our right front. I looked for traffic but he was initially blocked by the right windshield pillar of our aircraft. I moved my head to look around the pillar and saw an aircraft (cessna 172) entering the 45 degree mid-field left downwind on a collision course with us. I rolled sharply to the right and descended to avoid him and then I turned back to the left to follow him. All of this took roughly 10 seconds. Contributing factors were: my concentration on my student's procedures and the landing checklist in addition to scanning the base and final for traffic pointed out by the tower distracted me from scanning for traffic entering the downwind. The other aircraft pilot may have been similarly distracted. The tower was very busy and might have been distracted also, however, when he did point out the traffic he said nothing of the unusually close proximity. In my opinion, the tower allowed himself to become overwhelmed. Maybe there were too many aircraft in closed traffic, or maybe he just squeezed everyone in too close. Either way both aircraft failed to see and avoid and the tower failed to safely space traffic in the pattern. In high traffic areas during times of increased workload in the cockpit, it is easy to become distracted and get behind. This goes equally for tower controllers who sometimes bite off more than they can chew. Pilots must maintain their scan for traffic and not get lost inside the cockpit. Tower controllers must do their best to keep traffic separated in the traffic pattern.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA INSTRUCTOR AND TRAINEE HAD NMAC IN THE PATTERN AT HPN.
Narrative: I WAS WITH A STUDENT DOING TOUCH AND GOES IN CLOSED TFC. ON THE DOWNWIND FOR OUR THIRD TOUCH AND GO, TWR ASKED US TO FALL IN BEHIND THE CESSNA OFF OUR R FRONT. I LOOKED FOR TFC BUT HE WAS INITIALLY BLOCKED BY THE R WINDSHIELD PILLAR OF OUR ACFT. I MOVED MY HEAD TO LOOK AROUND THE PILLAR AND SAW AN ACFT (CESSNA 172) ENTERING THE 45 DEG MID-FIELD L DOWNWIND ON A COLLISION COURSE WITH US. I ROLLED SHARPLY TO THE R AND DSNDED TO AVOID HIM AND THEN I TURNED BACK TO THE L TO FOLLOW HIM. ALL OF THIS TOOK ROUGHLY 10 SECONDS. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE: MY CONCENTRATION ON MY STUDENT'S PROCS AND THE LNDG CHKLIST IN ADDITION TO SCANNING THE BASE AND FINAL FOR TFC POINTED OUT BY THE TWR DISTRACTED ME FROM SCANNING FOR TFC ENTERING THE DOWNWIND. THE OTHER ACFT PLT MAY HAVE BEEN SIMILARLY DISTRACTED. THE TWR WAS VERY BUSY AND MIGHT HAVE BEEN DISTRACTED ALSO, HOWEVER, WHEN HE DID POINT OUT THE TFC HE SAID NOTHING OF THE UNUSUALLY CLOSE PROX. IN MY OPINION, THE TWR ALLOWED HIMSELF TO BECOME OVERWHELMED. MAYBE THERE WERE TOO MANY ACFT IN CLOSED TFC, OR MAYBE HE JUST SQUEEZED EVERYONE IN TOO CLOSE. EITHER WAY BOTH ACFT FAILED TO SEE AND AVOID AND THE TWR FAILED TO SAFELY SPACE TFC IN THE PATTERN. IN HIGH TFC AREAS DURING TIMES OF INCREASED WORKLOAD IN THE COCKPIT, IT IS EASY TO BECOME DISTRACTED AND GET BEHIND. THIS GOES EQUALLY FOR TWR CTLRS WHO SOMETIMES BITE OFF MORE THAN THEY CAN CHEW. PLTS MUST MAINTAIN THEIR SCAN FOR TFC AND NOT GET LOST INSIDE THE COCKPIT. TWR CTLRS MUST DO THEIR BEST TO KEEP TFC SEPARATED IN THE TFC PATTERN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.