Narrative:

Customary procedure is to tell approach control what 'ramp entry point' you're going to use. They pass it to ground control. As this was our 'home base,' but I was going to a gate I hadn't been to for at least 6 months, I picked the wrong entry point, even though it was the one closest to our gate. As a result, we ended up nose-to-nose with another aircraft as they were crossing an active runway. Luckily I noticed the conflict developing and asked ground control who was giving way. They were none-too-happy that we'd 'lied' to them about our entry point, but as there was no blocked taxiway and we were able to follow the other aircraft, it was a short 'event' with no major consequences. Point learned was that after a 6 hour late-afternoon to early am (in the time zone we started in) flight, vigilance is the key.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DC10-30 FLC EXITED THE ACTIVE RWY AND WERE NOSE TO NOSE WITH ANOTHER DC10 AT MEM.

Narrative: CUSTOMARY PROC IS TO TELL APCH CTL WHAT 'RAMP ENTRY POINT' YOU'RE GOING TO USE. THEY PASS IT TO GND CTL. AS THIS WAS OUR 'HOME BASE,' BUT I WAS GOING TO A GATE I HADN'T BEEN TO FOR AT LEAST 6 MONTHS, I PICKED THE WRONG ENTRY POINT, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS THE ONE CLOSEST TO OUR GATE. AS A RESULT, WE ENDED UP NOSE-TO-NOSE WITH ANOTHER ACFT AS THEY WERE XING AN ACTIVE RWY. LUCKILY I NOTICED THE CONFLICT DEVELOPING AND ASKED GND CTL WHO WAS GIVING WAY. THEY WERE NONE-TOO-HAPPY THAT WE'D 'LIED' TO THEM ABOUT OUR ENTRY POINT, BUT AS THERE WAS NO BLOCKED TXWY AND WE WERE ABLE TO FOLLOW THE OTHER ACFT, IT WAS A SHORT 'EVENT' WITH NO MAJOR CONSEQUENCES. POINT LEARNED WAS THAT AFTER A 6 HR LATE-AFTERNOON TO EARLY AM (IN THE TIME ZONE WE STARTED IN) FLT, VIGILANCE IS THE KEY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.