 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Captain of a government beech king air failed to advise tower that he was executing a VFR missed approach at decision ht from an ILS approach causing the controller to unexpectedly resequence departure and arrival traffic.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 451680 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199910 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : oak.airport |
| State Reference | CA |
| Altitude | agl single value : 200 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | other |
| Make Model Name | Super King Air 200/Huron |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 29 |
| Flight Phase | landing : missed approach |
| Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | government other |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 50 flight time total : 25000 flight time type : 500 |
| ASRS Report | 451680 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government other |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : clearance |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | controller : separated traffic none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
A cross country training flight for instrument proficiency with a number of approachs in the sfo bay area. All went well until we executed a planned VFR missed for runway 29 at oak. The tower (local controller who really was orchestrating the numerous arrs and departures exceptionally well) had obviously expected us to land as we (I) failed to insure she knew we were a planned missed. Part of the problem was tight spacing between arrs and departures and I really did not want to shoe-horn a king air into the rollout sequence. In any event we executed a VFR missed, they corrected us to a real missed and we got to revisit aviation/ATC 101 with the clearance delivery folks following our next landing. Lesson relearned: make sure everyone knows of your vast plan lest it turn out to be half that.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF A GOV BEECH KING AIR FAILED TO ADVISE TWR THAT HE WAS EXECUTING A VFR MISSED APCH AT DECISION HT FROM AN ILS APCH CAUSING THE CTLR TO UNEXPECTEDLY RESEQUENCE DEP AND ARR TFC.
Narrative: A XCOUNTRY TRAINING FLT FOR INST PROFICIENCY WITH A NUMBER OF APCHS IN THE SFO BAY AREA. ALL WENT WELL UNTIL WE EXECUTED A PLANNED VFR MISSED FOR RWY 29 AT OAK. THE TWR (LCL CTLR WHO REALLY WAS ORCHESTRATING THE NUMEROUS ARRS AND DEPS EXCEPTIONALLY WELL) HAD OBVIOUSLY EXPECTED US TO LAND AS WE (I) FAILED TO INSURE SHE KNEW WE WERE A PLANNED MISSED. PART OF THE PROB WAS TIGHT SPACING BTWN ARRS AND DEPS AND I REALLY DID NOT WANT TO SHOE-HORN A KING AIR INTO THE ROLLOUT SEQUENCE. IN ANY EVENT WE EXECUTED A VFR MISSED, THEY CORRECTED US TO A REAL MISSED AND WE GOT TO REVISIT AVIATION/ATC 101 WITH THE CLRNC DELIVERY FOLKS FOLLOWING OUR NEXT LNDG. LESSON RELEARNED: MAKE SURE EVERYONE KNOWS OF YOUR VAST PLAN LEST IT TURN OUT TO BE HALF THAT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.