37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 453962 |
Time | |
Date | 199910 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : rdu.airport |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 8000 msl bound upper : 8500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : rdu.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Jetstream 32 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : rdu.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Cessna Citation Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 151 flight time total : 3001 flight time type : 301 |
ASRS Report | 453962 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : student |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : overshoot altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude conflict : airborne critical non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : far non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | atc equipment : conflict alert aircraft equipment : tcas other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : separated traffic flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : assigned or threatened penalties faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 4500 vertical : 400 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We were on an assigned heading of 080 degrees level at 8000 ft, being radar vectored for landing at rdu. The landing runway for this approach was runway 23R which was assigned by ATC. The captain was the PF. The first officer was the PNF. We received a TCASII alert that traffic was approaching at a very high rate of speed. The TCASII immediately began to inform us that there was a 'traffic, traffic' threat. I immediately interpreted the information from the TCASII screen and began to focus outside the cockpit for an immediate visual at the 2-3 O'clock position. Within 2-3 seconds of the TCASII instructing us to 'climb, climb,' I obtained a visual on the jet and told him (the captain) to climb quickly. ATC advised us after climbing to above 8000 ft (by +400-600 ft to clear the conflict) that the jet traffic was at fault and we were not at fault. We deviated from altitude to prevent a possible midair collision. The TCASII was very effective in aiding our decision to climb. The citation jet obviously did not have control of their aircraft when the controller relayed to them that they had deviated from their assigned altitude by at least 1000 ft. Corrective actions here are that there should have been situational awareness and CRM applications in place on behalf of the citation crew. I think this will enhance the safety level and make flying much safer.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A BA32 FO RPTED A CONFLICT WITH A CITATION IN THE VICINITY OF RDU.
Narrative: WE WERE ON AN ASSIGNED HDG OF 080 DEGS LEVEL AT 8000 FT, BEING RADAR VECTORED FOR LNDG AT RDU. THE LNDG RWY FOR THIS APCH WAS RWY 23R WHICH WAS ASSIGNED BY ATC. THE CAPT WAS THE PF. THE FO WAS THE PNF. WE RECEIVED A TCASII ALERT THAT TFC WAS APCHING AT A VERY HIGH RATE OF SPD. THE TCASII IMMEDIATELY BEGAN TO INFORM US THAT THERE WAS A 'TFC, TFC' THREAT. I IMMEDIATELY INTERPED THE INFO FROM THE TCASII SCREEN AND BEGAN TO FOCUS OUTSIDE THE COCKPIT FOR AN IMMEDIATE VISUAL AT THE 2-3 O'CLOCK POS. WITHIN 2-3 SECONDS OF THE TCASII INSTRUCTING US TO 'CLB, CLB,' I OBTAINED A VISUAL ON THE JET AND TOLD HIM (THE CAPT) TO CLB QUICKLY. ATC ADVISED US AFTER CLBING TO ABOVE 8000 FT (BY +400-600 FT TO CLR THE CONFLICT) THAT THE JET TFC WAS AT FAULT AND WE WERE NOT AT FAULT. WE DEVIATED FROM ALT TO PREVENT A POSSIBLE MIDAIR COLLISION. THE TCASII WAS VERY EFFECTIVE IN AIDING OUR DECISION TO CLB. THE CITATION JET OBVIOUSLY DID NOT HAVE CTL OF THEIR ACFT WHEN THE CTLR RELAYED TO THEM THAT THEY HAD DEVIATED FROM THEIR ASSIGNED ALT BY AT LEAST 1000 FT. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HERE ARE THAT THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND CRM APPLICATIONS IN PLACE ON BEHALF OF THE CITATION CREW. I THINK THIS WILL ENHANCE THE SAFETY LEVEL AND MAKE FLYING MUCH SAFER.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.