Air carrier flies wrong departure from dfw.

Attributes
ACN	455170
Time
Date	199911
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	1801 To 2400
Place
Locale Reference	airport : dfw.airport
State Reference	TX
Altitude	msl single value : 1500
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Night
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : d10.tracon tower : stl.tower
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Brasilia EMB-120 All Series
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Navigation In Use	other
Flight Phase	climbout : initial
Route In Use	departure sid : keene 5
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 25 flight time total : 460 flight time type : 20
ASRS Report	455170
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : multi engine pilot : atp
Events
Anomaly	non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued new clearance controller : separated traffic
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

We were assigned by clearance delivery the tri-gate 5 departure which calls for a 120 degree heading after takeoff. Captain was thinking, however, we were doing the keene 5 departure, which was on our dispatch release. I did not catch his misunderstanding and we proceeded with the keene 5 departure and turned to a 240 degree heading after takeoff from runway 13L. This turn put us across the departure paths of runways 17L/C/right. The departure controller corrected our heading but only after having to direct other departures away from us. We are unsure of any separation problems. This problem arose on the ground when we did not thoroughly discuss our routing before takeoff. Factors included both pilots being unfamiliar with dfw and the fact that we were both newly qualified in our respective position. Also, my assumption that the captain knew better than I did. In addition, at dfw tower does not assign/confirm initial heading with the takeoff clearance. In my estimation though, this problem came from both of us not discussing and confirming our clearance before departure -- especially at an unfamiliar airport.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR FLIES WRONG DEP FROM DFW.

Narrative: WE WERE ASSIGNED BY CLRNC DELIVERY THE TRI-GATE 5 DEP WHICH CALLS FOR A 120 DEG HDG AFTER TKOF. CAPT WAS THINKING, HOWEVER, WE WERE DOING THE KEENE 5 DEP, WHICH WAS ON OUR DISPATCH RELEASE. I DID NOT CATCH HIS MISUNDERSTANDING AND WE PROCEEDED WITH THE KEENE 5 DEP AND TURNED TO A 240 DEG HDG AFTER TKOF FROM RWY 13L. THIS TURN PUT US ACROSS THE DEP PATHS OF RWYS 17L/C/R. THE DEP CTLR CORRECTED OUR HDG BUT ONLY AFTER HAVING TO DIRECT OTHER DEPS AWAY FROM US. WE ARE UNSURE OF ANY SEPARATION PROBS. THIS PROB AROSE ON THE GND WHEN WE DID NOT THOROUGHLY DISCUSS OUR ROUTING BEFORE TKOF. FACTORS INCLUDED BOTH PLTS BEING UNFAMILIAR WITH DFW AND THE FACT THAT WE WERE BOTH NEWLY QUALIFIED IN OUR RESPECTIVE POS. ALSO, MY ASSUMPTION THAT THE CAPT KNEW BETTER THAN I DID. IN ADDITION, AT DFW TWR DOES NOT ASSIGN/CONFIRM INITIAL HDG WITH THE TKOF CLRNC. IN MY ESTIMATION THOUGH, THIS PROB CAME FROM BOTH OF US NOT DISCUSSING AND CONFIRMING OUR CLRNC BEFORE DEP -- ESPECIALLY AT AN UNFAMILIAR ARPT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.