37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 458403 |
Time | |
Date | 199912 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
State Reference | FO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 20000 msl bound upper : 21500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zma.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : vacating altitude |
Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zma.artcc |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 165 flight time total : 6017 flight time type : 2533 |
ASRS Report | 458403 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 1600 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 458206 |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : overshoot conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued alert flight crew : returned to assigned altitude |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 30000 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The nassau tower and departure frequencys were very busy resulting in us first being left on runway heading (136 degrees) up to 4000 ft and then on a 230 degree up to 12000 ft for approximately 20 mi. I, the captain and PNF, attempted repeatedly to obtain an on course heading from departure. Finally successful, we were assigned a 360 degree heading to intercept BR22V. When we switched to ZMA, we received a clearance to proceed direct to fll VOR and a climb which I read back as FL220. A discussion then ensued with the ZMA controller over nassau leaving us on the 230 degree heading for so long. The ZMA controller said that he saw us on his radar and wondered what was going on, so he had placed a call to nassau to remind them about us. I responded that we were grateful because it was very busy and the nassau controller had apparently forgotten about us. Later in the climb through approximately FL180, we were told that there was opposite direction traffic at FL230 and to expect higher passing. Approaching FL200 we were switched to a new miami frequency. A brief period of time passed before there was a break on the frequency enabling me to check on. As we passed through FL205 we received a TA, so I selected the traffic display and saw traffic 500 ft above approaching, and then passing 5 mi off our left. Shortly thereafter the controller acknowledged our check on, informed us of traffic passing off our left and asked what altitude we were assigned. I responded FL220 to which he said that he showed FL200 and that they would be pulling tapes. In hindsight, I believe that the delays encountered with the bahamian controller and the ensuing discussion with the ZMA controller over our treatment, resulted in an inattn to detail regarding the altitude assignment and read back on both the controller's and my part.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF A CANADAIR CL65 REGIONAL JET OVERSHOT ALT DURING CLB DUE TO MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE CLRNC ALT AND NOT NOTICED BY THE ARTCC CTLR DURING THE CAPT'S READBACK.
Narrative: THE NASSAU TWR AND DEP FREQS WERE VERY BUSY RESULTING IN US FIRST BEING LEFT ON RWY HDG (136 DEGS) UP TO 4000 FT AND THEN ON A 230 DEG UP TO 12000 FT FOR APPROX 20 MI. I, THE CAPT AND PNF, ATTEMPTED REPEATEDLY TO OBTAIN AN ON COURSE HDG FROM DEP. FINALLY SUCCESSFUL, WE WERE ASSIGNED A 360 DEG HDG TO INTERCEPT BR22V. WHEN WE SWITCHED TO ZMA, WE RECEIVED A CLRNC TO PROCEED DIRECT TO FLL VOR AND A CLB WHICH I READ BACK AS FL220. A DISCUSSION THEN ENSUED WITH THE ZMA CTLR OVER NASSAU LEAVING US ON THE 230 DEG HDG FOR SO LONG. THE ZMA CTLR SAID THAT HE SAW US ON HIS RADAR AND WONDERED WHAT WAS GOING ON, SO HE HAD PLACED A CALL TO NASSAU TO REMIND THEM ABOUT US. I RESPONDED THAT WE WERE GRATEFUL BECAUSE IT WAS VERY BUSY AND THE NASSAU CTLR HAD APPARENTLY FORGOTTEN ABOUT US. LATER IN THE CLB THROUGH APPROX FL180, WE WERE TOLD THAT THERE WAS OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC AT FL230 AND TO EXPECT HIGHER PASSING. APCHING FL200 WE WERE SWITCHED TO A NEW MIAMI FREQ. A BRIEF PERIOD OF TIME PASSED BEFORE THERE WAS A BREAK ON THE FREQ ENABLING ME TO CHK ON. AS WE PASSED THROUGH FL205 WE RECEIVED A TA, SO I SELECTED THE TFC DISPLAY AND SAW TFC 500 FT ABOVE APCHING, AND THEN PASSING 5 MI OFF OUR L. SHORTLY THEREAFTER THE CTLR ACKNOWLEDGED OUR CHK ON, INFORMED US OF TFC PASSING OFF OUR L AND ASKED WHAT ALT WE WERE ASSIGNED. I RESPONDED FL220 TO WHICH HE SAID THAT HE SHOWED FL200 AND THAT THEY WOULD BE PULLING TAPES. IN HINDSIGHT, I BELIEVE THAT THE DELAYS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE BAHAMIAN CTLR AND THE ENSUING DISCUSSION WITH THE ZMA CTLR OVER OUR TREATMENT, RESULTED IN AN INATTN TO DETAIL REGARDING THE ALT ASSIGNMENT AND READ BACK ON BOTH THE CTLR'S AND MY PART.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.