37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 459820 |
Time | |
Date | 200001 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : oak.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time total : 77 |
ASRS Report | 459820 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : 3 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance FAA |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
I attend a professional flight academy. I have been at the school for just over 4 months, and earned my private pilot certificate at the beginning of dec/99. After returning from a training flight, my instructor and I were met at the fuel truck (our school's truck) by FAA inspectors conducting a standard ramp check. They were very professional and courteous. They found all of our paperwork to be current and in order. On inspecting the plane, a few items were questioned. However, not being experts on C172's, they felt they could say only that the items 'might' constitute an airworthiness problem. They encouraged us that in the future anything we saw during preflight that we were unsure of, we should question with maintenance. Other than that, they said we checked out ok. The next day it came to my attention, and I verified it personally, that the inspectors had returned to the plane later, after we had parked it and tied it down, and did in fact squawk a number of items. Again, these were items they felt 'might' be airworthiness issues, but were not certain.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 INSTRUCTOR AND TRAINEE HAD AN FAA RAMP CHK.
Narrative: I ATTEND A PROFESSIONAL FLT ACADEMY. I HAVE BEEN AT THE SCHOOL FOR JUST OVER 4 MONTHS, AND EARNED MY PVT PLT CERTIFICATE AT THE BEGINNING OF DEC/99. AFTER RETURNING FROM A TRAINING FLT, MY INSTRUCTOR AND I WERE MET AT THE FUEL TRUCK (OUR SCHOOL'S TRUCK) BY FAA INSPECTORS CONDUCTING A STANDARD RAMP CHK. THEY WERE VERY PROFESSIONAL AND COURTEOUS. THEY FOUND ALL OF OUR PAPERWORK TO BE CURRENT AND IN ORDER. ON INSPECTING THE PLANE, A FEW ITEMS WERE QUESTIONED. HOWEVER, NOT BEING EXPERTS ON C172'S, THEY FELT THEY COULD SAY ONLY THAT THE ITEMS 'MIGHT' CONSTITUTE AN AIRWORTHINESS PROB. THEY ENCOURAGED US THAT IN THE FUTURE ANYTHING WE SAW DURING PREFLT THAT WE WERE UNSURE OF, WE SHOULD QUESTION WITH MAINT. OTHER THAN THAT, THEY SAID WE CHKED OUT OK. THE NEXT DAY IT CAME TO MY ATTN, AND I VERIFIED IT PERSONALLY, THAT THE INSPECTORS HAD RETURNED TO THE PLANE LATER, AFTER WE HAD PARKED IT AND TIED IT DOWN, AND DID IN FACT SQUAWK A NUMBER OF ITEMS. AGAIN, THESE WERE ITEMS THEY FELT 'MIGHT' BE AIRWORTHINESS ISSUES, BUT WERE NOT CERTAIN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.