Narrative:

Switching from tower to approach without being told to do so. Unsure of directions to follow. Student pilot with limited experience in radar controled environment was a contributing factor. I am the flight instructor who endorsed the student pilot's logbook and pilot certificate for a solo cross country flight from sjc to sts. As I understand, the student pilot contacted sjc clearance delivery stating that he was intending to make a VFR flight to sts. Sjc clearance delivery issued a clearance to fly runway heading, maintain VFR at or below 4000 ft, departure frequency, 121.30 and a transponder code (unknown number). The student's readback did not include the maintain runway heading portion of the clearance issued. The controller stated that the readback was correct and to expect a right turn to a heading of 020 degrees (towards the sunol intersection). The student pilot then contacted sjc ground control for his taxi clearance to runway 29 runup and then runway 29. Upon holding short of runway 29, the student pilot contacted sjc tower and was cleared for takeoff. At about 300 ft AGL, the student made an unauthorized frequency change to bay departure on 121.30. The bay departure controller, believing all traffic conflicts had been resolved, instructed the student pilot to resume his own navigation. Upon receiving this instruction, the student pilot turned to the 020 degree heading he was told to expect from the sjc clearance controller. Unfortunately, a B757 was cleared for takeoff on a parallel runway a few mins after the student pilot departed. When the student pilot made his right turn to a 020 degree heading, he put himself directly into the flight path of the B757. The B757 made a low level left turn to avoid a midair collision, missing the student pilot's aircraft by 300 ft. This incident, I believe, was the result of a student pilot not fully understanding the departure clearance instructions given to him, making an unauthorized frequency change to departure control and not being aware of the potential traffic conflict to which he was exposing himself. A contributing factor was the student pilot's heavy workload demanded by a cross country flight and lack of experience flying in a class C environment.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C172 STUDENT PLT MAKES A PREMATURE TURN OFF RWY 29 AT SJC AND HAS AN NMAC WITH A DEP B757 OFF RWY 30 AT SJC, CA.

Narrative: SWITCHING FROM TWR TO APCH WITHOUT BEING TOLD TO DO SO. UNSURE OF DIRECTIONS TO FOLLOW. STUDENT PLT WITH LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN RADAR CTLED ENVIRONMENT WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. I AM THE FLT INSTRUCTOR WHO ENDORSED THE STUDENT PLT'S LOGBOOK AND PLT CERTIFICATE FOR A SOLO XCOUNTRY FLT FROM SJC TO STS. AS I UNDERSTAND, THE STUDENT PLT CONTACTED SJC CLRNC DELIVERY STATING THAT HE WAS INTENDING TO MAKE A VFR FLT TO STS. SJC CLRNC DELIVERY ISSUED A CLRNC TO FLY RWY HDG, MAINTAIN VFR AT OR BELOW 4000 FT, DEP FREQ, 121.30 AND A XPONDER CODE (UNKNOWN NUMBER). THE STUDENT'S READBACK DID NOT INCLUDE THE MAINTAIN RWY HDG PORTION OF THE CLRNC ISSUED. THE CTLR STATED THAT THE READBACK WAS CORRECT AND TO EXPECT A R TURN TO A HDG OF 020 DEGS (TOWARDS THE SUNOL INTXN). THE STUDENT PLT THEN CONTACTED SJC GND CTL FOR HIS TAXI CLRNC TO RWY 29 RUNUP AND THEN RWY 29. UPON HOLDING SHORT OF RWY 29, THE STUDENT PLT CONTACTED SJC TWR AND WAS CLRED FOR TKOF. AT ABOUT 300 FT AGL, THE STUDENT MADE AN UNAUTH FREQ CHANGE TO BAY DEP ON 121.30. THE BAY DEP CTLR, BELIEVING ALL TFC CONFLICTS HAD BEEN RESOLVED, INSTRUCTED THE STUDENT PLT TO RESUME HIS OWN NAV. UPON RECEIVING THIS INSTRUCTION, THE STUDENT PLT TURNED TO THE 020 DEG HDG HE WAS TOLD TO EXPECT FROM THE SJC CLRNC CTLR. UNFORTUNATELY, A B757 WAS CLRED FOR TKOF ON A PARALLEL RWY A FEW MINS AFTER THE STUDENT PLT DEPARTED. WHEN THE STUDENT PLT MADE HIS R TURN TO A 020 DEG HDG, HE PUT HIMSELF DIRECTLY INTO THE FLT PATH OF THE B757. THE B757 MADE A LOW LEVEL L TURN TO AVOID A MIDAIR COLLISION, MISSING THE STUDENT PLT'S ACFT BY 300 FT. THIS INCIDENT, I BELIEVE, WAS THE RESULT OF A STUDENT PLT NOT FULLY UNDERSTANDING THE DEP CLRNC INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO HIM, MAKING AN UNAUTH FREQ CHANGE TO DEP CTL AND NOT BEING AWARE OF THE POTENTIAL TFC CONFLICT TO WHICH HE WAS EXPOSING HIMSELF. A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS THE STUDENT PLT'S HVY WORKLOAD DEMANDED BY A XCOUNTRY FLT AND LACK OF EXPERIENCE FLYING IN A CLASS C ENVIRONMENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.