Narrative:

On apr/xa/00 stl-msn at 17000 ft, we encountered severe icing and were forced to descend without an ATC clearance. A contributing factor was that our WX radar was attenuating and did not see the thunderstorm cell. We attempted to contact ZAU to ask for a lower altitude. He stated he was too 'busy' and he would get back to us. At this point we could not maintain altitude without stalling the aircraft. I then elected to descend immediately to avoid a very dangerous situation. To my knowledge no action was filed. Possibly, another contributing factor was that the center controller was working 2 frequencys on a night where he should have been working 1. Several aircraft were deviating for thunderstorm avoidance. Please be advised that this was not the controller's fault, but perhaps a lack of proper staffing. (No damage occurred to the aircraft.)

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ATR42 FLC DEVIATE FROM ASSIGNED ALT DUE TO ICING WHEN ATC IS UNABLE TO IMMEDIATELY PROVIDE ALT CHANGE.

Narrative: ON APR/XA/00 STL-MSN AT 17000 FT, WE ENCOUNTERED SEVERE ICING AND WERE FORCED TO DSND WITHOUT AN ATC CLRNC. A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS THAT OUR WX RADAR WAS ATTENUATING AND DID NOT SEE THE TSTM CELL. WE ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT ZAU TO ASK FOR A LOWER ALT. HE STATED HE WAS TOO 'BUSY' AND HE WOULD GET BACK TO US. AT THIS POINT WE COULD NOT MAINTAIN ALT WITHOUT STALLING THE ACFT. I THEN ELECTED TO DSND IMMEDIATELY TO AVOID A VERY DANGEROUS SIT. TO MY KNOWLEDGE NO ACTION WAS FILED. POSSIBLY, ANOTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS THAT THE CTR CTLR WAS WORKING 2 FREQS ON A NIGHT WHERE HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WORKING 1. SEVERAL ACFT WERE DEVIATING FOR TSTM AVOIDANCE. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS WAS NOT THE CTLR'S FAULT, BUT PERHAPS A LACK OF PROPER STAFFING. (NO DAMAGE OCCURRED TO THE ACFT.)

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.