37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 473731 |
Time | |
Date | 200004 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Cheetah, Tiger, Traveler |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance ground : parked |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | technician : powerplant technician : airframe |
ASRS Report | 473731 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Qualification | technician : airframe technician : powerplant |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other other : person 2 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Maintenance Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
I am the owner of a grumman AA5A cheetah and I lease it to a flight school. I also work at the flight school as an airframe certificated mechanic. The event in question is of my doing. I paid a fellow co-worker certificated a&P mechanic to perform a 100 hour inspection on my AA5A, xbxa. He did so and returned the aircraft back to service. I spoke with him about the 100 hour and knew of all the defects that were found and repaired. Now, 4 weeks later, the next 100 hour came due and I paid the same a&P mechanic to do the 100 hour again. Now this week I would be gone on a trip for 1 week and overseas aboard a ship so, just prior to my departure for the day, I noticed the propeller log had not been signed off for the previous 100 hour inspection. I figured the mechanic must have forgot. I knew he would do this again, so I wrote the missing log entry for the 100 hour on the propeller and signed his name and his a&P number to the write-up. My intentions were to show him and if he liked the write-up he could initial or re-endorse the log entry and my books would be in order. But I did not see him and had to leave on my trip and thought it would be ok until I returned since he would be performing the next 100 hour anyway. Now, upon my return, he left a message for me about a logbook discrepancy he found. I finally talked to the mechanic. He was completely mad and accused me of forgery. I explained the situation and he said he did sign off the propeller but he put in the airframe logbook, so I X'ed out the write-up and wrote in big bold letters 'improper entry, see airframe logbook for this 100 hour propeller inspection.' the mechanic said everything was fine, but he was going to keep a photocopy of the write-up before it was X'ed out and I don't want anything to come of this, so I am filling out this form to help with any future events over the bad entry in the propeller log. Now I must say I intended no malice or wrong doing in this situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A GRUMMAN AA5A 100 HR CHK PROP WAS SIGNED OFF IMPROPERLY BY A PERSON NOT DOING THE WORK.
Narrative: I AM THE OWNER OF A GRUMMAN AA5A CHEETAH AND I LEASE IT TO A FLT SCHOOL. I ALSO WORK AT THE FLT SCHOOL AS AN AIRFRAME CERTIFICATED MECH. THE EVENT IN QUESTION IS OF MY DOING. I PAID A FELLOW CO-WORKER CERTIFICATED A&P MECH TO PERFORM A 100 HR INSPECTION ON MY AA5A, XBXA. HE DID SO AND RETURNED THE ACFT BACK TO SVC. I SPOKE WITH HIM ABOUT THE 100 HR AND KNEW OF ALL THE DEFECTS THAT WERE FOUND AND REPAIRED. NOW, 4 WKS LATER, THE NEXT 100 HR CAME DUE AND I PAID THE SAME A&P MECH TO DO THE 100 HR AGAIN. NOW THIS WK I WOULD BE GONE ON A TRIP FOR 1 WK AND OVERSEAS ABOARD A SHIP SO, JUST PRIOR TO MY DEP FOR THE DAY, I NOTICED THE PROP LOG HAD NOT BEEN SIGNED OFF FOR THE PREVIOUS 100 HR INSPECTION. I FIGURED THE MECH MUST HAVE FORGOT. I KNEW HE WOULD DO THIS AGAIN, SO I WROTE THE MISSING LOG ENTRY FOR THE 100 HR ON THE PROP AND SIGNED HIS NAME AND HIS A&P NUMBER TO THE WRITE-UP. MY INTENTIONS WERE TO SHOW HIM AND IF HE LIKED THE WRITE-UP HE COULD INITIAL OR RE-ENDORSE THE LOG ENTRY AND MY BOOKS WOULD BE IN ORDER. BUT I DID NOT SEE HIM AND HAD TO LEAVE ON MY TRIP AND THOUGHT IT WOULD BE OK UNTIL I RETURNED SINCE HE WOULD BE PERFORMING THE NEXT 100 HR ANYWAY. NOW, UPON MY RETURN, HE LEFT A MESSAGE FOR ME ABOUT A LOGBOOK DISCREPANCY HE FOUND. I FINALLY TALKED TO THE MECH. HE WAS COMPLETELY MAD AND ACCUSED ME OF FORGERY. I EXPLAINED THE SIT AND HE SAID HE DID SIGN OFF THE PROP BUT HE PUT IN THE AIRFRAME LOGBOOK, SO I X'ED OUT THE WRITE-UP AND WROTE IN BIG BOLD LETTERS 'IMPROPER ENTRY, SEE AIRFRAME LOGBOOK FOR THIS 100 HR PROP INSPECTION.' THE MECH SAID EVERYTHING WAS FINE, BUT HE WAS GOING TO KEEP A PHOTOCOPY OF THE WRITE-UP BEFORE IT WAS X'ED OUT AND I DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO COME OF THIS, SO I AM FILLING OUT THIS FORM TO HELP WITH ANY FUTURE EVENTS OVER THE BAD ENTRY IN THE PROP LOG. NOW I MUST SAY I INTENDED NO MALICE OR WRONG DOING IN THIS SIT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.