37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 486372 |
Time | |
Date | 200009 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bna.airport |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | agl single value : 200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bna.tower tower : sav.tower |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | PA-31 Navajo Chieftan/Mojave/Navajo T1020 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bna.tower |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | ground : position and hold |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 56 flight time total : 2613 flight time type : 681 |
ASRS Report | 486372 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : separated traffic flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 500 vertical : 500 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation other |
Narrative:
On sep/thu/00, I was flying a navajo, arriving at nashville, tn, (bna) at approximately XA45. We were approaching from the southeast on an IFR flight plan. The WX was good VFR (ceiling 25000 ft, visibility 10 SM). There were 2 pilots onboard a part 91 cpr passenger flight. Bna was landing on runways 2L, 2R, and 2C. I had the airport in sight, and was told to proceed straight for the end of the runway. We were approximately 5 mi out, on a right dogleg to the runway. We were cleared for a visual approach, and told to contact the tower. The copilot called the tower with a visual approach, and we were cleared to land on runway 2C. When we were approximately 1 mi out, I thought I saw an aircraft on the runway. It was hard to tell as the suspected aircraft was on the wide, white threshold stripes on the runway. I asked the copilot if he thought there was an airplane on the runway. He wasn't sure. At approximately 1/4 mi we saw that it was definitely an airplane on the runway, and it was not moving. At this point, we were too close for him to take off in front of us, and I didn't want to land in front of him. I initiated a go around, and called the tower. The tower responded with 'go around to the left.' when I heard this, I looked to the left runway 2L and saw that I was in a position to land (they are offset, runway 2L starts farther north than runway 2C) and that the runway was clear. I understood the local controller as clearing me to land on the 'left.' I responded with 'cleared for the left.' while maneuvering to land on runway 2L, we saw a flight of 3 military blackhawk helicopter's approaching from the west. I queried my copilot as to whether we were cleared for runway 2L, he thought we were cleared to land runway 2L. I thought the blackhawks were going to parallel the runway. I was flying the airplane, lining up with the runway. When I looked back at the helicopter, I saw that he was directly in front of us, approximately 500 ft above us. At this point, the local controller told us to 'go around to the left, you have a blackhawk above you.' I made an immediate climbing left turn while maintaining visual separation on the lead helicopter. We joined the left downwind, and landed on runway 2C. While taxiing in, I was asked to call the tower. I called the tower, and spoke to the local controller. He admitted that he didn't know the aircraft was still on the runway. He didn't know if he had cleared it for takeoff, if the aircraft had not heard him, or was having some kind of delay. We also discussed the misunderstanding when he told me 'go around to the left.' I think the initial problem was the aircraft on the runway while we were cleared to land. We were not told of the aircraft holding in position. I should have asked the tower as soon as I suspected an aircraft on the runway. If I had, there would have been time to sort it out. The controller should have used better language for his go around instructions. He had traffic for runway 2R and didn't want me to turn right. If he had said 'go around, heading 270 degrees' there would have been no mistake. I have heard (and said) many times 'cleared for the left' when cleared to land. Non-standard phrases played a part in this incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CAPT OF A PIPER PA31, NAVAJO, TURNED AND CLBED AFTER OBSERVING MIL BLACKHAWK HELI'S WITHIN 500 FT OVERHEAD ON SHORT FINAL TO LAND. AT THE SAME TIME THE TWR CTLR RECOGNIZED THE MISTAKE OF RPTR'S APCHING TO LAND RATHER THAN GOING AROUND AS INSTRUCTED.
Narrative: ON SEP/THU/00, I WAS FLYING A NAVAJO, ARRIVING AT NASHVILLE, TN, (BNA) AT APPROX XA45. WE WERE APCHING FROM THE SE ON AN IFR FLT PLAN. THE WX WAS GOOD VFR (CEILING 25000 FT, VIS 10 SM). THERE WERE 2 PLTS ONBOARD A PART 91 CPR PAX FLT. BNA WAS LNDG ON RWYS 2L, 2R, AND 2C. I HAD THE ARPT IN SIGHT, AND WAS TOLD TO PROCEED STRAIGHT FOR THE END OF THE RWY. WE WERE APPROX 5 MI OUT, ON A R DOGLEG TO THE RWY. WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH, AND TOLD TO CONTACT THE TWR. THE COPLT CALLED THE TWR WITH A VISUAL APCH, AND WE WERE CLRED TO LAND ON RWY 2C. WHEN WE WERE APPROX 1 MI OUT, I THOUGHT I SAW AN ACFT ON THE RWY. IT WAS HARD TO TELL AS THE SUSPECTED ACFT WAS ON THE WIDE, WHITE THRESHOLD STRIPES ON THE RWY. I ASKED THE COPLT IF HE THOUGHT THERE WAS AN AIRPLANE ON THE RWY. HE WASN'T SURE. AT APPROX 1/4 MI WE SAW THAT IT WAS DEFINITELY AN AIRPLANE ON THE RWY, AND IT WAS NOT MOVING. AT THIS POINT, WE WERE TOO CLOSE FOR HIM TO TAKE OFF IN FRONT OF US, AND I DIDN'T WANT TO LAND IN FRONT OF HIM. I INITIATED A GAR, AND CALLED THE TWR. THE TWR RESPONDED WITH 'GAR TO THE L.' WHEN I HEARD THIS, I LOOKED TO THE L RWY 2L AND SAW THAT I WAS IN A POS TO LAND (THEY ARE OFFSET, RWY 2L STARTS FARTHER N THAN RWY 2C) AND THAT THE RWY WAS CLR. I UNDERSTOOD THE LCL CTLR AS CLRING ME TO LAND ON THE 'L.' I RESPONDED WITH 'CLRED FOR THE L.' WHILE MANEUVERING TO LAND ON RWY 2L, WE SAW A FLT OF 3 MIL BLACKHAWK HELI'S APCHING FROM THE W. I QUERIED MY COPLT AS TO WHETHER WE WERE CLRED FOR RWY 2L, HE THOUGHT WE WERE CLRED TO LAND RWY 2L. I THOUGHT THE BLACKHAWKS WERE GOING TO PARALLEL THE RWY. I WAS FLYING THE AIRPLANE, LINING UP WITH THE RWY. WHEN I LOOKED BACK AT THE HELI, I SAW THAT HE WAS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF US, APPROX 500 FT ABOVE US. AT THIS POINT, THE LCL CTLR TOLD US TO 'GAR TO THE L, YOU HAVE A BLACKHAWK ABOVE YOU.' I MADE AN IMMEDIATE CLBING L TURN WHILE MAINTAINING VISUAL SEPARATION ON THE LEAD HELI. WE JOINED THE L DOWNWIND, AND LANDED ON RWY 2C. WHILE TAXIING IN, I WAS ASKED TO CALL THE TWR. I CALLED THE TWR, AND SPOKE TO THE LCL CTLR. HE ADMITTED THAT HE DIDN'T KNOW THE ACFT WAS STILL ON THE RWY. HE DIDN'T KNOW IF HE HAD CLRED IT FOR TKOF, IF THE ACFT HAD NOT HEARD HIM, OR WAS HAVING SOME KIND OF DELAY. WE ALSO DISCUSSED THE MISUNDERSTANDING WHEN HE TOLD ME 'GAR TO THE L.' I THINK THE INITIAL PROB WAS THE ACFT ON THE RWY WHILE WE WERE CLRED TO LAND. WE WERE NOT TOLD OF THE ACFT HOLDING IN POS. I SHOULD HAVE ASKED THE TWR AS SOON AS I SUSPECTED AN ACFT ON THE RWY. IF I HAD, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN TIME TO SORT IT OUT. THE CTLR SHOULD HAVE USED BETTER LANGUAGE FOR HIS GAR INSTRUCTIONS. HE HAD TFC FOR RWY 2R AND DIDN'T WANT ME TO TURN R. IF HE HAD SAID 'GAR, HEADING 270 DEGS' THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO MISTAKE. I HAVE HEARD (AND SAID) MANY TIMES 'CLRED FOR THE L' WHEN CLRED TO LAND. NON-STANDARD PHRASES PLAYED A PART IN THIS INCIDENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.