37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 487814 |
Time | |
Date | 200009 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phx.airport |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground other : post flt |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 7000 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 487814 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft |
Narrative:
As the captain of this scheduled part 121 flight, I completed my preflight, which included an inspection and review of the aircraft logbook. Everything appeared normal, included an airworthiness released which had been recorded 2 or 3 days earlier. I noted the airplane had been ferried due to some minor maintenance which had been performed. I failed to remember that ferry flts for maintenance related purposes required a new airworthiness release. We flew the airplane uneventfully, as did 9 other air crews since the ferry flight. Another company pilot caught the discrepancy a day or two later, and brought it to the attention of our company maintenance department. Maintenance then signed off a new airworthiness release. The company pilot who caught the discrepancy called me and told me about it on oct/mon/00. I could have prevented this oversight by having better knowledge of the requirements for an airworthy airplane. Even though I had been made aware of the maintenance/ferry flight requirement in the past, I did not correctly apply this rule to my logbook inspection. The fact that our company maintenance failed to record the release is no excuse for my oversight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF AN LGT OPERATED ACFT WITHOUT CURRENT MAINT FLT RELEASE AFTER A MAINT FERRY FLT.
Narrative: AS THE CAPT OF THIS SCHEDULED PART 121 FLT, I COMPLETED MY PREFLT, WHICH INCLUDED AN INSPECTION AND REVIEW OF THE ACFT LOGBOOK. EVERYTHING APPEARED NORMAL, INCLUDED AN AIRWORTHINESS RELEASED WHICH HAD BEEN RECORDED 2 OR 3 DAYS EARLIER. I NOTED THE AIRPLANE HAD BEEN FERRIED DUE TO SOME MINOR MAINT WHICH HAD BEEN PERFORMED. I FAILED TO REMEMBER THAT FERRY FLTS FOR MAINT RELATED PURPOSES REQUIRED A NEW AIRWORTHINESS RELEASE. WE FLEW THE AIRPLANE UNEVENTFULLY, AS DID 9 OTHER AIR CREWS SINCE THE FERRY FLT. ANOTHER COMPANY PLT CAUGHT THE DISCREPANCY A DAY OR TWO LATER, AND BROUGHT IT TO THE ATTN OF OUR COMPANY MAINT DEPT. MAINT THEN SIGNED OFF A NEW AIRWORTHINESS RELEASE. THE COMPANY PLT WHO CAUGHT THE DISCREPANCY CALLED ME AND TOLD ME ABOUT IT ON OCT/MON/00. I COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS OVERSIGHT BY HAVING BETTER KNOWLEDGE OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN AIRWORTHY AIRPLANE. EVEN THOUGH I HAD BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE MAINT/FERRY FLT REQUIREMENT IN THE PAST, I DID NOT CORRECTLY APPLY THIS RULE TO MY LOGBOOK INSPECTION. THE FACT THAT OUR COMPANY MAINT FAILED TO RECORD THE RELEASE IS NO EXCUSE FOR MY OVERSIGHT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.