37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 488176 |
Time | |
Date | 200010 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bos.airport |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bos.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi landing : roll |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 170 flight time total : 725 flight time type : 225 |
ASRS Report | 488176 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 7300 flight time type : 800 |
ASRS Report | 488312 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : exited adverse environment flight crew : took evasive action none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were in a long taxi line at bos waiting for departure. ATC was using runways 22R&left for departures, and my captain and I discussed how we hadn't seen runway 22L used for departures. There was a constant rate of departures, one after another. Air carrier Z, a DC9, was ahead of us and it was cleared into position and hold on runway 22R. We heard our flight 'air carrier aaba cross runway 22R, head for echo.' my captain and I discussed quickly that maybe we were going to depart off runway 22L since our company had filed a more northern flight plan than usual. I said I was going to verify that the DC9 is position and hold was going to be at idle power since we were going to be passing right behind it. We asked the tower 'is the DC9 going to be at idle power for air carrier aaba?' tower responded that they didn't understand and to cross runway 22R and head for echo. Once again I asked, this time more simply, 'is the air carrier Z DC9 taking off?' tower responded no, and we began to cross behind the DC9. About 1/2 way across, I saw the DC9 begin to advance on the power and I told the captain to get across quickly. We avoided most of the jetblast and contacted ground as instructed. When we checked in on the ground frequency, we were instructed to go back to tower. I told them that we were just handed off to ground and that is when ground told us we had crossed using another company flight (air carrier aabc) clearance. We went back to tower and departed normally. The other flight (air carrier aabc) was instructed to monitor ground so we never knew they were downfield. We did not hear them read back the clearance to cross and we asked the tower multiple times about our concern to pass behind the DC9 in position. It happened that we were #1. They (ATC) had been using runway 22L, and a company flight with a very similar call sign was #1 to cross downfield. The only thing that might have helped would have been to be notified of a similar flight number would be crossing downfield, otherwise we had no idea about them. Supplemental information from acn 488312: what we didn't know is that our company with only 1 digit difference in call signs was running late and had just landed on runway 27 and was going to cross runway 22R to get to the gate area. Tower's intention was to get our company across runway 22R and we both ended up crossing the runway even though we verified the instructions with the correct call sign. The tower frequency was busy and it's hard to tell just where the miscom started. Everything turned out fine for all involved, but it just reinforced to my crew and I how vigilant we must always be and to always have situational awareness (ie, if it doesn't seem right, it probably isn't). The best fix we could come up with from our standpoint is to be more descriptive in our location and situation (ie, we want to verify that you want us to cross the approach end of runway 22R behind the DC9 in position and hold and continue on to runway 22L).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZBW LCL CTLR ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS TO AN ACR AFTER LNDG TO CROSS RWY 22L. A COMPANY ACR WITH A VERY SIMILAR CALL SIGN ON THE APCH END OF RWY 22L ACKNOWLEDGED THE CLRNC AND CROSSED BEHIND A DEPARTING DC9.
Narrative: WE WERE IN A LONG TAXI LINE AT BOS WAITING FOR DEP. ATC WAS USING RWYS 22R&L FOR DEPS, AND MY CAPT AND I DISCUSSED HOW WE HADN'T SEEN RWY 22L USED FOR DEPS. THERE WAS A CONSTANT RATE OF DEPS, ONE AFTER ANOTHER. ACR Z, A DC9, WAS AHEAD OF US AND IT WAS CLRED INTO POS AND HOLD ON RWY 22R. WE HEARD OUR FLT 'ACR AABA CROSS RWY 22R, HEAD FOR ECHO.' MY CAPT AND I DISCUSSED QUICKLY THAT MAYBE WE WERE GOING TO DEPART OFF RWY 22L SINCE OUR COMPANY HAD FILED A MORE NORTHERN FLT PLAN THAN USUAL. I SAID I WAS GOING TO VERIFY THAT THE DC9 IS POS AND HOLD WAS GOING TO BE AT IDLE PWR SINCE WE WERE GOING TO BE PASSING RIGHT BEHIND IT. WE ASKED THE TWR 'IS THE DC9 GOING TO BE AT IDLE PWR FOR ACR AABA?' TWR RESPONDED THAT THEY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND AND TO CROSS RWY 22R AND HEAD FOR ECHO. ONCE AGAIN I ASKED, THIS TIME MORE SIMPLY, 'IS THE ACR Z DC9 TAKING OFF?' TWR RESPONDED NO, AND WE BEGAN TO CROSS BEHIND THE DC9. ABOUT 1/2 WAY ACROSS, I SAW THE DC9 BEGIN TO ADVANCE ON THE PWR AND I TOLD THE CAPT TO GET ACROSS QUICKLY. WE AVOIDED MOST OF THE JETBLAST AND CONTACTED GND AS INSTRUCTED. WHEN WE CHKED IN ON THE GND FREQ, WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO GO BACK TO TWR. I TOLD THEM THAT WE WERE JUST HANDED OFF TO GND AND THAT IS WHEN GND TOLD US WE HAD CROSSED USING ANOTHER COMPANY FLT (ACR AABC) CLRNC. WE WENT BACK TO TWR AND DEPARTED NORMALLY. THE OTHER FLT (ACR AABC) WAS INSTRUCTED TO MONITOR GND SO WE NEVER KNEW THEY WERE DOWNFIELD. WE DID NOT HEAR THEM READ BACK THE CLRNC TO CROSS AND WE ASKED THE TWR MULTIPLE TIMES ABOUT OUR CONCERN TO PASS BEHIND THE DC9 IN POS. IT HAPPENED THAT WE WERE #1. THEY (ATC) HAD BEEN USING RWY 22L, AND A COMPANY FLT WITH A VERY SIMILAR CALL SIGN WAS #1 TO CROSS DOWNFIELD. THE ONLY THING THAT MIGHT HAVE HELPED WOULD HAVE BEEN TO BE NOTIFIED OF A SIMILAR FLT NUMBER WOULD BE XING DOWNFIELD, OTHERWISE WE HAD NO IDEA ABOUT THEM. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 488312: WHAT WE DIDN'T KNOW IS THAT OUR COMPANY WITH ONLY 1 DIGIT DIFFERENCE IN CALL SIGNS WAS RUNNING LATE AND HAD JUST LANDED ON RWY 27 AND WAS GOING TO CROSS RWY 22R TO GET TO THE GATE AREA. TWR'S INTENTION WAS TO GET OUR COMPANY ACROSS RWY 22R AND WE BOTH ENDED UP XING THE RWY EVEN THOUGH WE VERIFIED THE INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE CORRECT CALL SIGN. THE TWR FREQ WAS BUSY AND IT'S HARD TO TELL JUST WHERE THE MISCOM STARTED. EVERYTHING TURNED OUT FINE FOR ALL INVOLVED, BUT IT JUST REINFORCED TO MY CREW AND I HOW VIGILANT WE MUST ALWAYS BE AND TO ALWAYS HAVE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS (IE, IF IT DOESN'T SEEM RIGHT, IT PROBABLY ISN'T). THE BEST FIX WE COULD COME UP WITH FROM OUR STANDPOINT IS TO BE MORE DESCRIPTIVE IN OUR LOCATION AND SIT (IE, WE WANT TO VERIFY THAT YOU WANT US TO CROSS THE APCH END OF RWY 22R BEHIND THE DC9 IN POS AND HOLD AND CONTINUE ON TO RWY 22L).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.