37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 489380 |
Time | |
Date | 200010 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : phx.vortac |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | msl single value : 12000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : p50.tracon tower : clt.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other other vortac |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | departure sid : dryht2.dryht |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 230 flight time total : 5100 flight time type : 800 |
ASRS Report | 489380 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Our clearance out of phx was 'the dryheat 2' to dryheat J74-trw-tul, I entered this in the FMC an double-checked it with the filed route. Looking at the departure chart is where I made the mistake. Since we were given dryheat intersection in the clearance, this sounded like a departure transition. On the chart it depicts the 070 degree radial off of pxr to bayta, chopr, and so on. This radial coincides with the 075 degree heading off of runway 7L at 4 DME. The chart also shows a 100 degree heading vector at 4 DME as well. I mistakenly thought that the 100 degree vector was a separate transition and since we had been cleared to dryheat intersection, I intercepted the 070 degree radial and flew outbound. Departure questioned us at this point and then cleared us to bayta on course but asked us to call them. There were not any aircraft close by and we created no conflict. One other thing. Company had departed ahead of us and tower had given us the following: 'company ahead will be turning sbound, maintain visual with him, cleared for takeoff.' this reinforced my belief that we were going to be on different transitions and diverging at the 4 DME point. The blame is squarely on my shoulders for not thoroughly reading all of the textual procedure. I do, however, think the chart needs to be improved so that there is a more definite separation between the initial headings and the 070 degree radial. If there was more of a break on the chart there would have been no confusion on my part.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC MISINTERPRETED A DEP SID AND FAILED TO MAKE A REQUIRED TURN.
Narrative: OUR CLRNC OUT OF PHX WAS 'THE DRYHEAT 2' TO DRYHEAT J74-TRW-TUL, I ENTERED THIS IN THE FMC AN DOUBLE-CHKED IT WITH THE FILED RTE. LOOKING AT THE DEP CHART IS WHERE I MADE THE MISTAKE. SINCE WE WERE GIVEN DRYHEAT INTXN IN THE CLRNC, THIS SOUNDED LIKE A DEP TRANSITION. ON THE CHART IT DEPICTS THE 070 DEG RADIAL OFF OF PXR TO BAYTA, CHOPR, AND SO ON. THIS RADIAL COINCIDES WITH THE 075 DEG HDG OFF OF RWY 7L AT 4 DME. THE CHART ALSO SHOWS A 100 DEG HDG VECTOR AT 4 DME AS WELL. I MISTAKENLY THOUGHT THAT THE 100 DEG VECTOR WAS A SEPARATE TRANSITION AND SINCE WE HAD BEEN CLRED TO DRYHEAT INTXN, I INTERCEPTED THE 070 DEG RADIAL AND FLEW OUTBOUND. DEP QUESTIONED US AT THIS POINT AND THEN CLRED US TO BAYTA ON COURSE BUT ASKED US TO CALL THEM. THERE WERE NOT ANY ACFT CLOSE BY AND WE CREATED NO CONFLICT. ONE OTHER THING. COMPANY HAD DEPARTED AHEAD OF US AND TWR HAD GIVEN US THE FOLLOWING: 'COMPANY AHEAD WILL BE TURNING SBOUND, MAINTAIN VISUAL WITH HIM, CLRED FOR TKOF.' THIS REINFORCED MY BELIEF THAT WE WERE GOING TO BE ON DIFFERENT TRANSITIONS AND DIVERGING AT THE 4 DME POINT. THE BLAME IS SQUARELY ON MY SHOULDERS FOR NOT THOROUGHLY READING ALL OF THE TEXTUAL PROC. I DO, HOWEVER, THINK THE CHART NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED SO THAT THERE IS A MORE DEFINITE SEPARATION BTWN THE INITIAL HEADINGS AND THE 070 DEG RADIAL. IF THERE WAS MORE OF A BREAK ON THE CHART THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO CONFUSION ON MY PART.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.