37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 492262 |
Time | |
Date | 200011 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mri.airport |
State Reference | AK |
Altitude | agl single value : 30 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Weather Elements | Turbulence |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mri.tower tower : lax.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Cessna 150 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mri.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff climbout : initial |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Experience | controller non radar : 18 controller time certified in position1 : 4 flight time total : 500 |
ASRS Report | 492262 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe inflight encounter : turbulence non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : insufficient time |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 2000 vertical : 30 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
Merrill field (mri) has 2 runways, 6/24 and 15/33. The runways do not intersect, but the departure corridor for runway 24 intersects with the departure corridor for runway 33. I was working local combined with ground control. WX was VFR but turbulent. Air carrier X, a C150, had requested to taxi for departure on runway 33, and was instructed to taxi to that runway. Air carrier Y, a C172 operated as an air taxi, requested to taxi to runway 6. I told him the wind favored runway 24, and he asked, and I instructed him to taxi to runway 24. Air carrier Z, a C207, operated as an air taxi by the same company, requested to taxi to runway 6. I told him the wind favored runway 24, but he still wanted runway 6, so I instructed him to taxi to runway 6. Air carrier U, a C150, was doing touch and goes on runway 24. Air carrier X requested takeoff clearance on runway 33. I observed that air carrier X was on climb out, past the intersection, so I cleared air carrier Z for takeoff. Air carrier Z requested takeoff on runway 6, and I observed he would not be a factor for air carrier U, so I cleared him for takeoff on runway 6. Air carrier Y then requested takeoff on runway 24, and I told him to hold short for the opposing direction departure. I scanned the runway prior to air carrier Z's departure, and then watched him as he departed. As soon as he passed the intersection where air carrier Y was waiting, I cleared air carrier Y for takeoff, completely forgetting that air carrier X would be a factor. About 10 seconds later I realized the conflict, and told air carrier Y to cancel his takeoff. Just as I said that he lifted off and said 'say again?' I turned my head and observed air carrier X crossing the runway 24 departure path. Air carrier Y was about 2000 ft from the end of the runway. A few moments later I got relieved from position and reported the operational error. Contributing factors: I was working ground combined with local, when it was not necessary to do so. I was being too permissive in allowing the departures their requested runways. Air carrier X and air carrier Z simply requested the closest runway to their base. I didn't take the whole air traffic picture into account when clearing air carrier Y. I had 3 departures from 3 different runways, all at the same time. Human performance considerations: I was trying to do everything for everybody, alone. I was being an 'accommodator' instead of a 'controller.' my attention was spread too thin, over too many different things.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: COMBINE GND AND LCL TWR CTLR MADE AN OPERROR WHEN HE CLRED A CESSNA 172 FOR TKOF WHEN A CESSNA 150 WAS XING THROUGH THE DEP PATH OF THE C172.
Narrative: MERRILL FIELD (MRI) HAS 2 RWYS, 6/24 AND 15/33. THE RWYS DO NOT INTERSECT, BUT THE DEP CORRIDOR FOR RWY 24 INTERSECTS WITH THE DEP CORRIDOR FOR RWY 33. I WAS WORKING LCL COMBINED WITH GND CTL. WX WAS VFR BUT TURBULENT. ACR X, A C150, HAD REQUESTED TO TAXI FOR DEP ON RWY 33, AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO TAXI TO THAT RWY. ACR Y, A C172 OPERATED AS AN AIR TAXI, REQUESTED TO TAXI TO RWY 6. I TOLD HIM THE WIND FAVORED RWY 24, AND HE ASKED, AND I INSTRUCTED HIM TO TAXI TO RWY 24. ACR Z, A C207, OPERATED AS AN AIR TAXI BY THE SAME COMPANY, REQUESTED TO TAXI TO RWY 6. I TOLD HIM THE WIND FAVORED RWY 24, BUT HE STILL WANTED RWY 6, SO I INSTRUCTED HIM TO TAXI TO RWY 6. ACR U, A C150, WAS DOING TOUCH AND GOES ON RWY 24. ACR X REQUESTED TKOF CLRNC ON RWY 33. I OBSERVED THAT ACR X WAS ON CLBOUT, PAST THE INTXN, SO I CLRED ACR Z FOR TKOF. ACR Z REQUESTED TKOF ON RWY 6, AND I OBSERVED HE WOULD NOT BE A FACTOR FOR ACR U, SO I CLRED HIM FOR TKOF ON RWY 6. ACR Y THEN REQUESTED TKOF ON RWY 24, AND I TOLD HIM TO HOLD SHORT FOR THE OPPOSING DIRECTION DEP. I SCANNED THE RWY PRIOR TO ACR Z'S DEP, AND THEN WATCHED HIM AS HE DEPARTED. AS SOON AS HE PASSED THE INTXN WHERE ACR Y WAS WAITING, I CLRED ACR Y FOR TKOF, COMPLETELY FORGETTING THAT ACR X WOULD BE A FACTOR. ABOUT 10 SECONDS LATER I REALIZED THE CONFLICT, AND TOLD ACR Y TO CANCEL HIS TKOF. JUST AS I SAID THAT HE LIFTED OFF AND SAID 'SAY AGAIN?' I TURNED MY HEAD AND OBSERVED ACR X XING THE RWY 24 DEP PATH. ACR Y WAS ABOUT 2000 FT FROM THE END OF THE RWY. A FEW MOMENTS LATER I GOT RELIEVED FROM POS AND RPTED THE OPERROR. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: I WAS WORKING GND COMBINED WITH LCL, WHEN IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO DO SO. I WAS BEING TOO PERMISSIVE IN ALLOWING THE DEPS THEIR REQUESTED RWYS. ACR X AND ACR Z SIMPLY REQUESTED THE CLOSEST RWY TO THEIR BASE. I DIDN'T TAKE THE WHOLE AIR TFC PICTURE INTO ACCOUNT WHEN CLRING ACR Y. I HAD 3 DEPS FROM 3 DIFFERENT RWYS, ALL AT THE SAME TIME. HUMAN PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS: I WAS TRYING TO DO EVERYTHING FOR EVERYBODY, ALONE. I WAS BEING AN 'ACCOMMODATOR' INSTEAD OF A 'CTLR.' MY ATTN WAS SPREAD TOO THIN, OVER TOO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.