Narrative:

The nose gear on the 737-800 would not extend normally when putting the gear handle down. Following the QRH, the nosegear was extended manually and a normal approach and landing was made. (Made a go around after the gear would not extend normally the first time.) this problem is not uncommon on the new generation 737's (600-700-800), apparently, this aircraft had not yet been modified by boeing to correct the known problem in the nose gear down line. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the B737-600, 700 and 800 models are experiencing problems with the hydraulic fuse located in the nose landing gear extend pressure line. The reporter said the problem is the fuse senses air and will then shut down hydraulic flow to extend cylinder. The reporter said there is a modification that corrects the problem, but this airplane was not modified. The reporter stated three reports of this type of failure including this incident have been reported recently on this carrier.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-800 ON APCH IS UNABLE TO EXTEND THE NOSE GEAR NORMALLY AND REQUIRED MANUAL EXTENSION. CAUSED BY A FAILED GEAR DOWN LINE HYDRAULIC FUSE.

Narrative: THE NOSE GEAR ON THE 737-800 WOULD NOT EXTEND NORMALLY WHEN PUTTING THE GEAR HANDLE DOWN. FOLLOWING THE QRH, THE NOSEGEAR WAS EXTENDED MANUALLY AND A NORMAL APCH AND LNDG WAS MADE. (MADE A GAR AFTER THE GEAR WOULD NOT EXTEND NORMALLY THE FIRST TIME.) THIS PROB IS NOT UNCOMMON ON THE NEW GENERATION 737'S (600-700-800), APPARENTLY, THIS ACFT HAD NOT YET BEEN MODIFIED BY BOEING TO CORRECT THE KNOWN PROBLEM IN THE NOSE GEAR DOWN LINE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE B737-600, 700 AND 800 MODELS ARE EXPERIENCING PROBS WITH THE HYDRAULIC FUSE LOCATED IN THE NOSE LNDG GEAR EXTEND PRESSURE LINE. THE RPTR SAID THE PROB IS THE FUSE SENSES AIR AND WILL THEN SHUT DOWN HYDRAULIC FLOW TO EXTEND CYLINDER. THE RPTR SAID THERE IS A MODIFICATION THAT CORRECTS THE PROB, BUT THIS AIRPLANE WAS NOT MODIFIED. THE RPTR STATED THREE RPTS OF THIS TYPE OF FAILURE INCLUDING THIS INCIDENT HAVE BEEN RPTED RECENTLY ON THIS CARRIER.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.