37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 515816 |
Time | |
Date | 200106 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bwi.airport |
State Reference | MD |
Altitude | msl single value : 11000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bwi.tracon tracon : dca.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | arrival star : ott.ott5 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 200 |
ASRS Report | 515816 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft ATC Facility |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
We were descending on the nottingham 5 arrival to bwi at our last cleared altitude of 11000 from washington approach. Traffic was at 10000 ft, so we were held high. After 1-2 mins we thought approach should have cleared us lower, so I queried washington approach and got no response. I switched to communication #2 and still got no response. I even tried baltimore approach on 119.7 with no response. I tried washington approach again on communication #1 and finally had radio contact. Washington approach told us to turn to a 360 degree heading and contact bwi approach on 117.7. Baltimore approach descended us to 6000 ft then 3000 ft. We saw the airport and landed using standard approach and landing procedures. Washington approach said there may be a stuck microphone on the frequency and it may be us. I told them we did not think it was us. I am not sure why the frequency was dead, but it sure did happen at a busy time on arrival. I think we did take appropriate action to re-establish radio communication by switching radio and frequencys.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-700 CREW LOST COM WITH APCH CTLR AT BWI.
Narrative: WE WERE DSNDING ON THE NOTTINGHAM 5 ARR TO BWI AT OUR LAST CLRED ALT OF 11000 FROM WASHINGTON APCH. TFC WAS AT 10000 FT, SO WE WERE HELD HIGH. AFTER 1-2 MINS WE THOUGHT APCH SHOULD HAVE CLRED US LOWER, SO I QUERIED WASHINGTON APCH AND GOT NO RESPONSE. I SWITCHED TO COM #2 AND STILL GOT NO RESPONSE. I EVEN TRIED BALTIMORE APCH ON 119.7 WITH NO RESPONSE. I TRIED WASHINGTON APCH AGAIN ON COM #1 AND FINALLY HAD RADIO CONTACT. WASHINGTON APCH TOLD US TO TURN TO A 360 DEG HDG AND CONTACT BWI APCH ON 117.7. BALTIMORE APCH DSNDED US TO 6000 FT THEN 3000 FT. WE SAW THE ARPT AND LANDED USING STANDARD APCH AND LNDG PROCS. WASHINGTON APCH SAID THERE MAY BE A STUCK MIKE ON THE FREQ AND IT MAY BE US. I TOLD THEM WE DID NOT THINK IT WAS US. I AM NOT SURE WHY THE FREQ WAS DEAD, BUT IT SURE DID HAPPEN AT A BUSY TIME ON ARR. I THINK WE DID TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO RE-ESTABLISH RADIO COM BY SWITCHING RADIO AND FREQS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.