37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 516763 |
Time | |
Date | 200107 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sav.airport |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 1500 msl bound upper : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Weather Elements | Rain |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sav.tracon tower : sav.tower tower : mkg.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 36 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 2400 flight time type : 850 |
ASRS Report | 516763 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather ATC Human Performance Navigational Facility |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : sav.tracon |
Navigational Aid | ITPV.ILS |
Narrative:
Approach was giving terrible vectors to the ILS in use. We were on a second approach after being vectored in too high the first time to ever get established. The second approach the controller vectored us in way too close to the airport for an IFR approach. The airport was in sight. The controller was unable to issue a visual clearance due to the tower reporting IFR conditions. We became established on the ILS close in. The GS became erratic and started jumping up and down. This caused us to get the aural 'GS' warning 2-3 times. The current 'flight visibility' was at least 3500 ft ceiling, and 5-6 mi visibility with light to moderate precipitation. The winds at the field were about 5 KTS out of the north. The first officer and myself conferred that the GS at sav was malfunctioning and that west were not low. Since we were in VFR conditions, I opted to continue the approach visually. On final, I let the aircraft get slightly high to check the GS. It still said we were low. At this time, I completed a safe stabilized visual approach and landed without incident. Upon landing we advised the tower of the malfunctioning GS. Note: the entire approach was conducted under VFR conditions. Upon landing the field was observed to be VMC also. The flight was never in danger.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EMB145 PIC RPT ON APCH CTLR TECHNIQUES IN RADAR VECTORS FOR APCH AND THE DEALING WITH A MALFUNCTIONING GS INTO SAV, GA.
Narrative: APCH WAS GIVING TERRIBLE VECTORS TO THE ILS IN USE. WE WERE ON A SECOND APCH AFTER BEING VECTORED IN TOO HIGH THE FIRST TIME TO EVER GET ESTABLISHED. THE SECOND APCH THE CTLR VECTORED US IN WAY TOO CLOSE TO THE ARPT FOR AN IFR APCH. THE ARPT WAS IN SIGHT. THE CTLR WAS UNABLE TO ISSUE A VISUAL CLRNC DUE TO THE TWR RPTING IFR CONDITIONS. WE BECAME ESTABLISHED ON THE ILS CLOSE IN. THE GS BECAME ERRATIC AND STARTED JUMPING UP AND DOWN. THIS CAUSED US TO GET THE AURAL 'GS' WARNING 2-3 TIMES. THE CURRENT 'FLT VISIBILITY' WAS AT LEAST 3500 FT CEILING, AND 5-6 MI VISIBILITY WITH LIGHT TO MODERATE PRECIP. THE WINDS AT THE FIELD WERE ABOUT 5 KTS OUT OF THE N. THE FO AND MYSELF CONFERRED THAT THE GS AT SAV WAS MALFUNCTIONING AND THAT W WERE NOT LOW. SINCE WE WERE IN VFR CONDITIONS, I OPTED TO CONTINUE THE APCH VISUALLY. ON FINAL, I LET THE ACFT GET SLIGHTLY HIGH TO CHK THE GS. IT STILL SAID WE WERE LOW. AT THIS TIME, I COMPLETED A SAFE STABILIZED VISUAL APCH AND LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. UPON LNDG WE ADVISED THE TWR OF THE MALFUNCTIONING GS. NOTE: THE ENTIRE APCH WAS CONDUCTED UNDER VFR CONDITIONS. UPON LNDG THE FIELD WAS OBSERVED TO BE VMC ALSO. THE FLT WAS NEVER IN DANGER.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.