37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 519942 |
Time | |
Date | 200107 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : tpa.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl single value : 1600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Weather Elements | Rain Thunderstorm |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : tpa.tracon artcc : zla.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Dash 8 Series Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 205 flight time total : 7318 flight time type : 870 |
ASRS Report | 519942 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Weather Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Tpa was using runway 36L&right for lndgs. We were advised to expect vectors for a visual approach to runway 36L since we were approaching the field from the northwest. A thunderstorm southwest of the field dictated that approachs would have to be made between the OM and the threshold. Rain was light in this area but lightning was present. We had been cleared to descend to 1600 ft on a heading of 110 degrees. Once we were below the broken clouds, I noticed the captain starting to veer left of the assigned heading. I asked if he wanted me to ask for deviations to the left and he said no. As he continued turning left past a heading of 100 degrees, I went ahead and told tpa approach that we needed to deviate slightly left. They were busy and didn't reply (or they were trying to figure out how to approve that while vectoring us for such a close approach). The apt kept turning until he was 40 degrees left of the assigned heading. A few seconds later he told me to report the field in sight and request clearance for the visual to runway 9. Though becoming flustered by this point, I did as instructed as we continued toward runway 9, which was in sight about 3 or 4 mi ahead. An aircraft was landing on runway 26L. Approach said 'stand by,' then cleared us for the visual to runway 9 and handed us off to tower a few seconds alter. We landed without further incident. Human performance considerations: the captain is well known in base as being extremely WX shy due to previous unhappy experiences with lightning and turbulence. I had witnessed an increase in the intensity of his concern and vigilance during previous legs of this trip, but he had followed clrncs and communicated his intentions very well up until then. I was probably not assertive enough in reporting his heading deviations to him, but I don't think it would have changed anything. I found out after the fact that he was following highway 60 to the airport to avoid lightning and turbulence by the widest margin. Faced with a 2-EDGED sword (lightning and ATC clearance), I attempted to assist with the captain's unknown intentions as quickly as I could adapt to the changing situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A DH8 CREW ON VECTORS FOR A VISUAL AT TPA DEVIATED FROM ASSIGNED HDG BY 40 DEGS TO STAY CLR OF WX, WITHOUT ADVISING ATC.
Narrative: TPA WAS USING RWY 36L&R FOR LNDGS. WE WERE ADVISED TO EXPECT VECTORS FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 36L SINCE WE WERE APCHING THE FIELD FROM THE NW. A TSTM SW OF THE FIELD DICTATED THAT APCHS WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE BTWN THE OM AND THE THRESHOLD. RAIN WAS LIGHT IN THIS AREA BUT LIGHTNING WAS PRESENT. WE HAD BEEN CLRED TO DSND TO 1600 FT ON A HDG OF 110 DEGS. ONCE WE WERE BELOW THE BROKEN CLOUDS, I NOTICED THE CAPT STARTING TO VEER L OF THE ASSIGNED HDG. I ASKED IF HE WANTED ME TO ASK FOR DEVS TO THE L AND HE SAID NO. AS HE CONTINUED TURNING L PAST A HDG OF 100 DEGS, I WENT AHEAD AND TOLD TPA APCH THAT WE NEEDED TO DEVIATE SLIGHTLY L. THEY WERE BUSY AND DIDN'T REPLY (OR THEY WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO APPROVE THAT WHILE VECTORING US FOR SUCH A CLOSE APCH). THE APT KEPT TURNING UNTIL HE WAS 40 DEGS L OF THE ASSIGNED HDG. A FEW SECONDS LATER HE TOLD ME TO RPT THE FIELD IN SIGHT AND REQUEST CLRNC FOR THE VISUAL TO RWY 9. THOUGH BECOMING FLUSTERED BY THIS POINT, I DID AS INSTRUCTED AS WE CONTINUED TOWARD RWY 9, WHICH WAS IN SIGHT ABOUT 3 OR 4 MI AHEAD. AN ACFT WAS LNDG ON RWY 26L. APCH SAID 'STAND BY,' THEN CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL TO RWY 9 AND HANDED US OFF TO TWR A FEW SECONDS ALTER. WE LANDED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. HUMAN PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS: THE CAPT IS WELL KNOWN IN BASE AS BEING EXTREMELY WX SHY DUE TO PREVIOUS UNHAPPY EXPERIENCES WITH LIGHTNING AND TURB. I HAD WITNESSED AN INCREASE IN THE INTENSITY OF HIS CONCERN AND VIGILANCE DURING PREVIOUS LEGS OF THIS TRIP, BUT HE HAD FOLLOWED CLRNCS AND COMMUNICATED HIS INTENTIONS VERY WELL UP UNTIL THEN. I WAS PROBABLY NOT ASSERTIVE ENOUGH IN RPTING HIS HDG DEVS TO HIM, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WOULD HAVE CHANGED ANYTHING. I FOUND OUT AFTER THE FACT THAT HE WAS FOLLOWING HWY 60 TO THE ARPT TO AVOID LIGHTNING AND TURB BY THE WIDEST MARGIN. FACED WITH A 2-EDGED SWORD (LIGHTNING AND ATC CLRNC), I ATTEMPTED TO ASSIST WITH THE CAPT'S UNKNOWN INTENTIONS AS QUICKLY AS I COULD ADAPT TO THE CHANGING SIT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.