Narrative:

During visual approach to runway 25L, lax, I noticed an aircraft that was landing on the north side, south of course. It seemed closer than normal. It was hard to tell how close, being night, so I did not call it a near miss. I believe it would have been if we didn't turn south off the localizer and descend. The turn from the north side is difficult for many reasons -- wind, controller vectors, limited visibility, etc. I have overshot it myself. I believe lax needs a final monitor control in place at all times or 2 aircraft will find the same space at the same time.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ON VISUAL APCH TO LAX RWY 25L, B767 FLC MAKE EVASIVE MANEUVER DUE TO ANOTHER ACFT TURNING BASE TO FINAL TO RWYS 24, OVERSHOOTING THE RWYS 24 FINAL APCH COURSE.

Narrative: DURING VISUAL APCH TO RWY 25L, LAX, I NOTICED AN ACFT THAT WAS LNDG ON THE N SIDE, S OF COURSE. IT SEEMED CLOSER THAN NORMAL. IT WAS HARD TO TELL HOW CLOSE, BEING NIGHT, SO I DID NOT CALL IT A NEAR MISS. I BELIEVE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IF WE DIDN'T TURN S OFF THE LOC AND DSND. THE TURN FROM THE N SIDE IS DIFFICULT FOR MANY REASONS -- WIND, CTLR VECTORS, LIMITED VISIBILITY, ETC. I HAVE OVERSHOT IT MYSELF. I BELIEVE LAX NEEDS A FINAL MONITOR CTL IN PLACE AT ALL TIMES OR 2 ACFT WILL FIND THE SAME SPACE AT THE SAME TIME.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.