37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 523759 |
Time | |
Date | 200108 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mia.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zdc.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mia.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 523752 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 523752 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
There was a need to ferry a B757 to aua, estimated time of departure XA00 and return with a planeload. The aircraft was located at the hangar and after coordination we got the aircraft off the ground a few mins late. Upon returning and landing over 6 hours later, we were notified of our gate, so we opted for runway 9L, and made an uneventful landing. Fatigue was really setting in at this point. I had already looked on my 10-9B chart for the location of gate and our exit from the runway (taxiway M5) had us headed straight for spot X -- our entry. Having ended trips recently in the concourse, and having a fatigue related mental lapse, I turned the aircraft eastbound on the ramp (taxiway north) before reaching spot X, thinking of going to gate. After having taxied abeam gates and realizing we're going the wrong direction, we told ground we'd have to go back for spot X. They told us to either do a 180 degree turn on the ramp, or taxi back on taxiway M to taxiway M5 to re-enter. As I turned the aircraft northbound on taxiway M6, a super 80 was stopped on taxiway M eastbound abeam gate xx. I thought the super 80 was on taxiway north, but in fact he was on taxiway M, and having been told to double back on taxiway M. I just knew that mia ground was having me on my way in a expeditious manner. Thinking I had just exited the ramp (really on taxiway north) and seeing the super 80 holding on taxiway M (thinking he was on taxiway north) the only logical piece of east/west concrete ahead of me would be taxiway M (not so -- it was runway 9L) our momentum was carrying us along when I saw the runway hold lines, but not in time to make a complete stop. I'd say that we were in a compromising position when miami ground told us that we were entering the runway, and to continue on it wbound to taxiway M5 for our entry point. They didn't seem too upset by our 'progressive taxi' mode, but I certainly was. This situation was an accumulation of factors such as fatigue, poor communications between the cockpit crew members and mia ground, operations in an area of the report where taxiway north and the ramp blend, and trying to get our passenger on their way. Although familiar with mia airport, had we been more cautious and watched our diagrams on the 10-9 charts, this occurrence would have never happened. Supplemental information from acn 523752: we cleared the runway and while I was performing the after landing checklist the captain taxied past our entry spot. We realized it and the captain requested clearance to turn around. ATC advised him to make a left turn on taxiway M or a 180 degree turn. The captain chose the left turn. I said to him we cannot make that turn since a super 80 was there. He said the super 80 was holding. I started to question whether or not I had heard the clearance correctly since he acknowledge what I was saying to him. There was a turboprop on the runway back tracking so I realize we were not in any danger as we proceeded toward the runway. Ground advised us that we were entering the runway and he stopped the aircraft suddenly. Since no other aircraft was in position for takeoff, ground allowed us to back track.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757 INADVERTENTLY ENTERS A RWY AFTER BECOMING CONFUSED WITH HIS TAXI INSTRUCTIONS.
Narrative: THERE WAS A NEED TO FERRY A B757 TO AUA, ESTIMATED TIME OF DEP XA00 AND RETURN WITH A PLANELOAD. THE ACFT WAS LOCATED AT THE HANGAR AND AFTER COORD WE GOT THE ACFT OFF THE GND A FEW MINS LATE. UPON RETURNING AND LNDG OVER 6 HRS LATER, WE WERE NOTIFIED OF OUR GATE, SO WE OPTED FOR RWY 9L, AND MADE AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG. FATIGUE WAS REALLY SETTING IN AT THIS POINT. I HAD ALREADY LOOKED ON MY 10-9B CHART FOR THE LOCATION OF GATE AND OUR EXIT FROM THE RWY (TXWY M5) HAD US HEADED STRAIGHT FOR SPOT X -- OUR ENTRY. HAVING ENDED TRIPS RECENTLY IN THE CONCOURSE, AND HAVING A FATIGUE RELATED MENTAL LAPSE, I TURNED THE ACFT EBOUND ON THE RAMP (TXWY N) BEFORE REACHING SPOT X, THINKING OF GOING TO GATE. AFTER HAVING TAXIED ABEAM GATES AND REALIZING WE'RE GOING THE WRONG DIRECTION, WE TOLD GND WE'D HAVE TO GO BACK FOR SPOT X. THEY TOLD US TO EITHER DO A 180 DEG TURN ON THE RAMP, OR TAXI BACK ON TXWY M TO TXWY M5 TO RE-ENTER. AS I TURNED THE ACFT NBOUND ON TXWY M6, A SUPER 80 WAS STOPPED ON TXWY M EBOUND ABEAM GATE XX. I THOUGHT THE SUPER 80 WAS ON TXWY N, BUT IN FACT HE WAS ON TXWY M, AND HAVING BEEN TOLD TO DOUBLE BACK ON TXWY M. I JUST KNEW THAT MIA GND WAS HAVING ME ON MY WAY IN A EXPEDITIOUS MANNER. THINKING I HAD JUST EXITED THE RAMP (REALLY ON TXWY N) AND SEEING THE SUPER 80 HOLDING ON TXWY M (THINKING HE WAS ON TXWY N) THE ONLY LOGICAL PIECE OF E/W CONCRETE AHEAD OF ME WOULD BE TXWY M (NOT SO -- IT WAS RWY 9L) OUR MOMENTUM WAS CARRYING US ALONG WHEN I SAW THE RWY HOLD LINES, BUT NOT IN TIME TO MAKE A COMPLETE STOP. I'D SAY THAT WE WERE IN A COMPROMISING POS WHEN MIAMI GND TOLD US THAT WE WERE ENTERING THE RWY, AND TO CONTINUE ON IT WBOUND TO TXWY M5 FOR OUR ENTRY POINT. THEY DIDN'T SEEM TOO UPSET BY OUR 'PROGRESSIVE TAXI' MODE, BUT I CERTAINLY WAS. THIS SIT WAS AN ACCUMULATION OF FACTORS SUCH AS FATIGUE, POOR COMS BTWN THE COCKPIT CREW MEMBERS AND MIA GND, OPS IN AN AREA OF THE RPT WHERE TXWY N AND THE RAMP BLEND, AND TRYING TO GET OUR PAX ON THEIR WAY. ALTHOUGH FAMILIAR WITH MIA ARPT, HAD WE BEEN MORE CAUTIOUS AND WATCHED OUR DIAGRAMS ON THE 10-9 CHARTS, THIS OCCURRENCE WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 523752: WE CLRED THE RWY AND WHILE I WAS PERFORMING THE AFTER LNDG CHKLIST THE CAPT TAXIED PAST OUR ENTRY SPOT. WE REALIZED IT AND THE CAPT REQUESTED CLRNC TO TURN AROUND. ATC ADVISED HIM TO MAKE A L TURN ON TXWY M OR A 180 DEG TURN. THE CAPT CHOSE THE L TURN. I SAID TO HIM WE CANNOT MAKE THAT TURN SINCE A SUPER 80 WAS THERE. HE SAID THE SUPER 80 WAS HOLDING. I STARTED TO QUESTION WHETHER OR NOT I HAD HEARD THE CLRNC CORRECTLY SINCE HE ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT I WAS SAYING TO HIM. THERE WAS A TURBOPROP ON THE RWY BACK TRACKING SO I REALIZE WE WERE NOT IN ANY DANGER AS WE PROCEEDED TOWARD THE RWY. GND ADVISED US THAT WE WERE ENTERING THE RWY AND HE STOPPED THE ACFT SUDDENLY. SINCE NO OTHER ACFT WAS IN POS FOR TKOF, GND ALLOWED US TO BACK TRACK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.