A C152 CFI and student have 2 runway incursions at tus, az.

Attributes
ACN	534870
Time
Date	200201
Day	Sat
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : tus.airport
State Reference	AZ
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Cessna 152
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : taxi
Flight Plan	VFR
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : instructor
Qualification	pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 35 flight time total : 865 flight time type : 370
ASRS Report	534870
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee
Events
Anomaly	incursion : runway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued alert controller : issued new clearance
Consequence	other Other
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance Airport Environmental Factor
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

While on approach to tucson international airport on a training flight, with a student, we were instructed to expect runway 11. 10 mi from the airport, we were told to now expect runway 21 for landing. Upon landing on runway 21, we inadvertently turned off the runway onto runway 11R. Tower admonished us for turning onto an active and then told us to turn left and make a 180 degree turn. The next problem was that we made a left turn, then a 180 degree turn and crossed runway 11R and proceeded down to runway 3 for our departure back to phoenix. We should not have turned onto an active runway upon landing nor should we have crossed the runway again. Contributing factors to this problem were an unprepared, talkative student, an instructor who should have silenced the student and paid attention to ATC, as well as the lack of an airport diagram onboard. Better CRM procedures would prevent these incursions from occurring.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A C152 CFI AND STUDENT HAVE 2 RWY INCURSIONS AT TUS, AZ.

Narrative: WHILE ON APCH TO TUCSON INTL ARPT ON A TRAINING FLT, WITH A STUDENT, WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO EXPECT RWY 11. 10 MI FROM THE ARPT, WE WERE TOLD TO NOW EXPECT RWY 21 FOR LNDG. UPON LNDG ON RWY 21, WE INADVERTENTLY TURNED OFF THE RWY ONTO RWY 11R. TWR ADMONISHED US FOR TURNING ONTO AN ACTIVE AND THEN TOLD US TO TURN L AND MAKE A 180 DEG TURN. THE NEXT PROB WAS THAT WE MADE A L TURN, THEN A 180 DEG TURN AND CROSSED RWY 11R AND PROCEEDED DOWN TO RWY 3 FOR OUR DEP BACK TO PHOENIX. WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TURNED ONTO AN ACTIVE RWY UPON LNDG NOR SHOULD WE HAVE CROSSED THE RWY AGAIN. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THIS PROB WERE AN UNPREPARED, TALKATIVE STUDENT, AN INSTRUCTOR WHO SHOULD HAVE SILENCED THE STUDENT AND PAID ATTN TO ATC, AS WELL AS THE LACK OF AN ARPT DIAGRAM ONBOARD. BETTER CRM PROCS WOULD PREVENT THESE INCURSIONS FROM OCCURRING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.