37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 538322 |
Time | |
Date | 200202 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : hyw.airport |
State Reference | SC |
Altitude | msl single value : 2000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Military |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 226 flight time total : 558 flight time type : 300 |
ASRS Report | 538322 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted none taken : detected after the fact |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 500 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance FAA |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
While flying with a student at 2000 ft from mao to hyw, student saw aircraft pass in front of our aircraft from left to right with no position lights/landing lights on. Beacon was operating, but made aircraft quite hard to see at night in reference to multiple lit towers. Aircraft was fast moving, and was gone as quickly as it was discovered. Therefore, evasive action was delayed, and then, not required. The lack of action to contact myr and inquire about aircraft was not taken, due to a quite shocked reaction by both pilots, and the agreement that the aircraft was, indeed, no longer a factor. In retrospect, we should have contacted ATC to determine at least type of aircraft. I believe it was quite possibly a military aircraft due to the gamecock MOA's being active on feb/wed/02, and the speed of such a low flying aircraft. The only reason my student saw the aircraft was due to its proximity, our landing lights shined on its fuselage.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT HAD LESS THAN COMFORTABLE SEPARATION WITH SUSPECTED MIL ACFT IN ZJX CLASS E AIRSPACE.
Narrative: WHILE FLYING WITH A STUDENT AT 2000 FT FROM MAO TO HYW, STUDENT SAW ACFT PASS IN FRONT OF OUR ACFT FROM L TO R WITH NO POS LIGHTS/LNDG LIGHTS ON. BEACON WAS OPERATING, BUT MADE ACFT QUITE HARD TO SEE AT NIGHT IN REF TO MULTIPLE LIT TWRS. ACFT WAS FAST MOVING, AND WAS GONE AS QUICKLY AS IT WAS DISCOVERED. THEREFORE, EVASIVE ACTION WAS DELAYED, AND THEN, NOT REQUIRED. THE LACK OF ACTION TO CONTACT MYR AND INQUIRE ABOUT ACFT WAS NOT TAKEN, DUE TO A QUITE SHOCKED REACTION BY BOTH PLTS, AND THE AGREEMENT THAT THE ACFT WAS, INDEED, NO LONGER A FACTOR. IN RETROSPECT, WE SHOULD HAVE CONTACTED ATC TO DETERMINE AT LEAST TYPE OF ACFT. I BELIEVE IT WAS QUITE POSSIBLY A MIL ACFT DUE TO THE GAMECOCK MOA'S BEING ACTIVE ON FEB/WED/02, AND THE SPD OF SUCH A LOW FLYING ACFT. THE ONLY REASON MY STUDENT SAW THE ACFT WAS DUE TO ITS PROX, OUR LNDG LIGHTS SHINED ON ITS FUSELAGE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.