37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 543239 |
Time | |
Date | 200204 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pao.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl single value : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : o90.tracon tower : pao.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument non precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 55 flight time total : 1040 flight time type : 185 |
ASRS Report | 543239 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact other |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
While being vectored for the final approach heading, raim was momentarily lost for the GPS approach into palo alto. Before I could notify ATC the raim was apparently restored. I was unaware that the approach mode did not return to 'active,' thereby increasing the CDI sensitivity needed to make an accurate approach. I continued the approach and broke out at 1500 ft to discover I was 1/4 mi to the right of runway centerline. I canceled IFR and went around the traffic pattern to land. 1/4 mi would appear acceptable needle deflection in an 'armed' approach CDI mode. I have contacted an avionics shop regarding the temporary 'lost raim.' they explained that it happens from time to time. This experience shows that the armed/active annunciator must be included in the instrument approach scan throughout the procedure.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A BE9L PLT, MAKING A GPS APCH TO PAO, BROKE OUT ONE QUARTER MI TO THE R OF THE RWY CTRLINE.
Narrative: WHILE BEING VECTORED FOR THE FINAL APCH HEADING, RAIM WAS MOMENTARILY LOST FOR THE GPS APCH INTO PALO ALTO. BEFORE I COULD NOTIFY ATC THE RAIM WAS APPARENTLY RESTORED. I WAS UNAWARE THAT THE APCH MODE DID NOT RETURN TO 'ACTIVE,' THEREBY INCREASING THE CDI SENSITIVITY NEEDED TO MAKE AN ACCURATE APCH. I CONTINUED THE APCH AND BROKE OUT AT 1500 FT TO DISCOVER I WAS 1/4 MI TO THE R OF RWY CTRLINE. I CANCELED IFR AND WENT AROUND THE TFC PATTERN TO LAND. 1/4 MI WOULD APPEAR ACCEPTABLE NEEDLE DEFLECTION IN AN 'ARMED' APCH CDI MODE. I HAVE CONTACTED AN AVIONICS SHOP REGARDING THE TEMPORARY 'LOST RAIM.' THEY EXPLAINED THAT IT HAPPENS FROM TIME TO TIME. THIS EXPERIENCE SHOWS THAT THE ARMED/ACTIVE ANNUNCIATOR MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE INST APCH SCAN THROUGHOUT THE PROC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.