C172 instructor and student were doing touch-and-goes when notamed that only full stops were permitt...

Attributes
ACN	544537
Time
Date	200204
Day	Sun
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : rnm.airport
State Reference	CA
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing : go around
Route In Use	approach : traffic pattern
Flight Plan	None
Aircraft 2
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : taxi
Flight Plan	VFR
Person 1
Function	instruction : instructor oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 1150 flight time type : 100
ASRS Report	544537
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : trainee
Events
Anomaly	conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact other
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance Airport
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

I received a duats briefing before this instructional flight. I am a CFI and I was going out flying with a soon to solo student. We departed myf and flew to rnm for touch-and-go practice. While flying in the downwind leg of the pattern, unicom advised us that the main runway was closed and they were using the taxiway that had been remarked to runway 28. No other information was relayed. Runway 28 had no txwys and all traffic had to taxi on the runway. Since traffic was very light, I elected to have the student do a couple of touch-and-goes. The other aircraft in the pattern was doing full stop lndgs and back-taxiing. On our third approach, we had to go around because the other aircraft stopped in the runway and turned around to back-taxi. When I inquired over the radio why he was doing this, he replied that he was advised that touch-and-goes were prohibited on the converted taxiway. I told him that I thought that what he was doing was unsafe. We immediately left the airport area and returned to myf. At myf, I obtained another duats briefing for the flight that we had just taken. I discovered that I had overlooked the ramona NOTAM. For the previous couple of months the NOTAM had been for displaced thresholds on the runway while construction was taking place. The NOTAM had been changed to the alternate runway with wingspan and weight limitations along with the prohibition of touch-and-goes. I had seen this NOTAM in the original briefing, but did not read it assuming that it was the previous NOTAM. I should have been more diligent in reading the NOTAMS.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C172 INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT WERE DOING TOUCH-AND-GOES WHEN NOTAMED THAT ONLY FULL STOPS WERE PERMITTED AT RNM.

Narrative: I RECEIVED A DUATS BRIEFING BEFORE THIS INSTRUCTIONAL FLT. I AM A CFI AND I WAS GOING OUT FLYING WITH A SOON TO SOLO STUDENT. WE DEPARTED MYF AND FLEW TO RNM FOR TOUCH-AND-GO PRACTICE. WHILE FLYING IN THE DOWNWIND LEG OF THE PATTERN, UNICOM ADVISED US THAT THE MAIN RWY WAS CLOSED AND THEY WERE USING THE TXWY THAT HAD BEEN REMARKED TO RWY 28. NO OTHER INFO WAS RELAYED. RWY 28 HAD NO TXWYS AND ALL TFC HAD TO TAXI ON THE RWY. SINCE TFC WAS VERY LIGHT, I ELECTED TO HAVE THE STUDENT DO A COUPLE OF TOUCH-AND-GOES. THE OTHER ACFT IN THE PATTERN WAS DOING FULL STOP LNDGS AND BACK-TAXIING. ON OUR THIRD APCH, WE HAD TO GO AROUND BECAUSE THE OTHER ACFT STOPPED IN THE RWY AND TURNED AROUND TO BACK-TAXI. WHEN I INQUIRED OVER THE RADIO WHY HE WAS DOING THIS, HE REPLIED THAT HE WAS ADVISED THAT TOUCH-AND-GOES WERE PROHIBITED ON THE CONVERTED TXWY. I TOLD HIM THAT I THOUGHT THAT WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS UNSAFE. WE IMMEDIATELY LEFT THE ARPT AREA AND RETURNED TO MYF. AT MYF, I OBTAINED ANOTHER DUATS BRIEFING FOR THE FLT THAT WE HAD JUST TAKEN. I DISCOVERED THAT I HAD OVERLOOKED THE RAMONA NOTAM. FOR THE PREVIOUS COUPLE OF MONTHS THE NOTAM HAD BEEN FOR DISPLACED THRESHOLDS ON THE RWY WHILE CONSTRUCTION WAS TAKING PLACE. THE NOTAM HAD BEEN CHANGED TO THE ALTERNATE RWY WITH WINGSPAN AND WT LIMITATIONS ALONG WITH THE PROHIBITION OF TOUCH-AND-GOES. I HAD SEEN THIS NOTAM IN THE ORIGINAL BRIEFING, BUT DID NOT READ IT ASSUMING THAT IT WAS THE PREVIOUS NOTAM. I SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE DILIGENT IN READING THE NOTAMS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

C172 instructor and student were doing touch-and-goes when notamed that only full stops were permitted at rnm.