Narrative:

On climb out, about 14000 ft, cargo door message. The cargo door indicator was deferred per the MEL. QRH consulted. No pressurization was noted. Controled by manual mode. QRH directed to divert. Maintenance consulted without any assistance. We diverted into crw. Despite the manual pressure control working, QRH recommended diversion. In the process, we flew past cho and then ended up near crw when everything was completed. Clarification on QRH procedure for no or if yes/no for control cabin pressure with manual control, in order to prevent confusion on diverting when everything was under control.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CARJ CREW, CLBING THROUGH 14000 FT, EXPERIENCED A LOSS OF CABIN PRESSURE DUE TO A CARGO DOOR LEAK.

Narrative: ON CLBOUT, ABOUT 14000 FT, CARGO DOOR MESSAGE. THE CARGO DOOR INDICATOR WAS DEFERRED PER THE MEL. QRH CONSULTED. NO PRESSURIZATION WAS NOTED. CTLED BY MANUAL MODE. QRH DIRECTED TO DIVERT. MAINT CONSULTED WITHOUT ANY ASSISTANCE. WE DIVERTED INTO CRW. DESPITE THE MANUAL PRESSURE CTL WORKING, QRH RECOMMENDED DIVERSION. IN THE PROCESS, WE FLEW PAST CHO AND THEN ENDED UP NEAR CRW WHEN EVERYTHING WAS COMPLETED. CLARIFICATION ON QRH PROC FOR NO OR IF YES/NO FOR CTL CABIN PRESSURE WITH MANUAL CTL, IN ORDER TO PREVENT CONFUSION ON DIVERTING WHEN EVERYTHING WAS UNDER CTL.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.